How can you assume accuracy?

You compare gyros to other gyro’s if they all indicate the same thing then you know they are calibrated correctly

and tested it in all different conditions trying to maek your own vacuum

it proved you wrong

and you didnt realise any results

cause it disproves your idea

💩

@bigolste
How was it collaborated, genius?
How do you know it's not biased?
Did you stop the rotation of the earth to collaborate for the rotation?

Stop the rotation of the Earth?

It proved no one wrong

the thing isnt fixed

you took it apart

Ok i just answered that for him @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

and put it together again

its simple physics using changes in velocity of light

theres not callobration needed

That's not scientific, nor can you prove that to have accuracy if the earth is still moving.

Mad u wanna debate in vc

No collaboration needed 😆 😆

yes put it on any planet

Man, you guys really know how to move the goal post.

it wont give you the same results

Mental gymnastics like a mother fucker

They aren’t designed to measure earths rotation. They just do. They’re not created for that purpose @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Then how come bob knodle of globe busters bought a 20’000 dollar ring laser gyro and it detected 15 degrees per hour rotation

Then you're detection of rotation can't be asaumed to be accurate. @zep tepi

Lemme guess controlled opposition?

well it can

?

Well they all detect the same thing though

That’s how gyro’s behave

They detect motion

if it does the job pal what more do you want

You can’t program that out

ive give you numbers

you ignore>

what more do you want us do g

Again... how do you know what was **"detected"** was the earths rotation?

What else could it be

Well common sense i guess

science mad