Message from @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan
Discord ID: 582270283059298305
He never accounted for refraction for a start
I could post many things that contradict or even debunk the Cavendish but id be wasting my time with these ppl
He reckons he knows the distance to the sun, gtfoh
Oh Cavendish?
Either
Stick man too
Lol
Ball man and stick man
Hey, I saw this server on a science discord server list and was hoping to discuss some specific medical topics
Am I on the right place?
lol
Puts sticks in ground... I have calculated how far mars is and how long it will take to get there, I reckon by the time we bleed all their wallets dry we could make it
The Cavendish Experiment:
The Cavendish experiment was considered the first experiment to directly measure the gravitational pull between two masses in a laboratory. It supposedly derived the gravitational constant and therefore also confirmed Universal Gravitation by measurement. However, the reasoning here on it demonstrating gravity would be that it is gravity because there is no other known explanation for it. The experiment itself composed of a torsion balance made of a six foot wood rod suspended from a wire. Lead balls were suspended placed near larger lead balls. The deviation of the small lead balls to the larger lead balls was measured, and was marked as the gravitational constant of universal gravitation.
Ooh a book
The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
A short video on Gravity:
https://youtu.be/A3H7Brj5NiE
First of all, no one has measured gravity for every atom and every star. It is simply a religious belief that it is "universal".
Secondly, school textbooks routinely make false statements. For example, "the moon goes around the earth." If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun. Anybody can look up at night and see the obvious gaps in gravity theory.
There are numerous other flaws. For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd. Moreover, if gravity were working on the early earth, then earth would have been bombarded out of existence by falling asteroids, meteors, comets, and other space junk. Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Since everything in the Universe tends to disorder according to the Second Law, orderly orbits are impossible.
Mullins
Where'd he go
Balled out physics
Where he go
However, consistent and successful results are derived from these measurements despite failing to account for the obvious issues that come into play. Why is that? An insightful read on the Cavendish experiment: http://milesmathis.com/caven.html
Supposedly, they have very little effect at even those relatively short distances.
It seems that Cavendish (and modern replications) succeeded by a compensation of errors. The large ball is getting in the way of the photons emitted by the wall. This blocking role of the large ball prevents the repulsion from the other direction, so the small ball veers towards the large ball. The big ball is blocking exactly that much that was missing from the equations, because of its loss of acceleration, so a compensation of errors allows this experiment to work. The experimenters are largely ignorant of the fields present, so there is variation in results with measuring G.
All protons and electrons emit a field of photons, and these photons cause repulsion by simple bombardment. This would give all particles a positive “charge", at this level, and would mean that all foundational E/M force is repulsive. Only when we begin to talk of electrical fields caused by flows of electrons can we talk about positive and negative charge, and that charge is caused only by differentials in field strength, or by what is called potentials. -Miles Mathis
Originally published here: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1902PhRvI..15..175B (Now removed)
Link: (PDF)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.01520. (PDF)
No actual measurement … was required: Maxwell and Cavendish’s null method for the inverse square law of electrostatics.
Mullins was trashed and threatened
Gave up
But everything in engineering is designed to project a flat earth on a spherical design?
Not sure of all.the details
His job was threatened
I'm suspicious they go somewhere
You really believe all theese deaths
Of popstars, musicians etc
And do you believe the official narratives pushed by the biased media
Brian Mullin imho, was probably really uncomfortable with being put in the limelight. Especially by people like Robbie Davidson. Where his intentions regarding fe, are suspect.
Other than his job and career being threatened of course.
I'd be uncomfortable too
That's why I don't talk
I'm still learning
Much if what we see and read is bullsh#t
Go your own path
👍
>>mute 463282860653281280 289847801750224896