homosexuality has never been proved wrong in the field of truth.

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

@パートナーキラー can a man have a baby with another man & vice versa?

no. but they can adopt if wanted.

So it’s not natural

Thus it’s wrong <:BigGrin:507986757753634826>

correct. but not natural does not always equal wrong.

is going outside your comfort zone wrong?

is trying something new wrong?

Not relevant

not all the time, no.

not natural = not normal.

Nobody can be forced to be not gay. The point is there’s simply a truth that it ultimately leads to the same emptiness as all sin does. So I can’t force my beliefs on a person, but I can tell them about them.

correct.

said being, your beliefs are an opinion and fact *to yourself*.

being gay is up to the person who is homosexual.

Anyhoo. I’m drifting. Have a goodnight peeps. https://giphy.com/gifs/cats-asleep-foster-LjDcSZTXzS9Py

goodnight, derek.

Gn

Homosexuality is wrong unless someone can show me a man and a man have a baby & vice versa <:BigGrin:507986757753634826>

how so?

not all straight families have kids.

A man and a woman is natural regardless if they have kids

thus it is just a neutral opinion based on having children.

but being not natural is not always wrong.

Spraying chemicals in the sky is not natural and it’s wrong <:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

heres an example to dumb it down for you.
say my “natural” option for dinner is fast food.
if i one day dont be natural and go for a dine in, nice, fancy restaurant, is that not okay?

Irrelevant

being not natural is not always bad.

HOW.

https://youtu.be/KuG_CeEZV6w

Tell me how thats irrelevant when you just made an example yourself.

@Citizen Z can you join vc

@パートナーキラー because I said so

PFFF

@パートナーキラー PF is a gang near by my house

PF stands for “Primera Flats”

pff also means im dying of laughter.

Lies

please tell me how my example is irrelevant, but yours isnt?