Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄
Discord ID: 586661295231598594
Not at all
you say you cannot match reality with your experiences
stop arguing about atoms and moving the goal post
you're not even looking into any of this
Never, not once, did I say it cannot exist.
so therefore, "if i cannot perceive it, then it's false"
I say I **CAN** match my reality with my experience
Pay attention
"You cannot match your reality with your experiences."
that's not what you said
Fucking Christ pay the fuck attention
You don’t experience the earth moving. You don’t observe it curving. But you believe it anyway, because of CGI, fisheye lenses, and cartoons. Your experiences have nothing to do with falsified material.
Stop you ludicrous and outrageously absurd presumptions
@Derek Nelson that's a pre-supposition
you don't perceive 70 mph in your car either
Sure I do.
no you don't
you only perceive acceleration
You literally need presuppositions for your globe to work
conservation of momentum
My God, man. Pay attention to your own bullshit.
no I don't, because we can measure BEYOND our own naked eye observations
You can't
yes you can.
You can assume someone can
You cannot
We can measure 10 miles
Flat
you cannot look and say "that is 10 miles" with only your naked eyes
If you go high enough
No, Nomad
you can't perceive distance on your own
you cannot perceive time on your own
I’ll even give you the benefit of a doubt. Point being, your argument doesn’t make any sense, when you’re using an enclosed system that has a physical barrier, like a car, in comparison to a ball earth that has no physical barrier.
I'm using it as a connection because conservation of momentum applies in both scenarios
you can only perceive acceleration, not constant velocity
whether in a car or on a spinning ball
Your hair stops whipping backwards in a Convertable?
it does whip back yes