Message from @RidleyChozo
Discord ID: 586660862987730984
hasn't been peer-reviewed yet
correct, non linear math
Math isn't set to your little box of understanding
but I'm not talking about theoreticals
We are talking about math doing anything
I'm talking about how 2 + 2 = 5 is logically inconsistent
Linearly, sure. But that's not what we've been saying.
@RidleyChozo ah, more photos to further illustrate my point
"it looks flat, so it MUST be flat"
@RidleyChozo you can see further away because of the observer's perspective.
Our reality matches with our experiences.
You cannot match your reality with your experiences.
thanks for proving how well the curvature equation works in reality
so therefore atoms do not exist, is your argument
"I do not experience it, therefore it does not exist"
Not at all
you say you cannot match reality with your experiences
stop arguing about atoms and moving the goal post
Never, not once, did I say it cannot exist.
so therefore, "if i cannot perceive it, then it's false"
I say I **CAN** match my reality with my experience
Pay attention
"You cannot match your reality with your experiences."
that's not what you said
Fucking Christ pay the fuck attention
You don’t experience the earth moving. You don’t observe it curving. But you believe it anyway, because of CGI, fisheye lenses, and cartoons. Your experiences have nothing to do with falsified material.
Stop you ludicrous and outrageously absurd presumptions
@Derek Nelson that's a pre-supposition
you don't perceive 70 mph in your car either
Sure I do.
no you don't
you only perceive acceleration
You literally need presuppositions for your globe to work
conservation of momentum
You do not experience any of it
My God, man. Pay attention to your own bullshit.
no I don't, because we can measure BEYOND our own naked eye observations
You can't