to hvae space to be in...you need a container to surround it

We're arguing semantics about whether or not electromagnetic containment of ionized gas counts as gas pressure next to a vacuum without a container

no

you literally make it inside a container man

and say dont worry about that little guy

Electromagnetic containment of ionized gas,

No.

I mean obviously we see gas next to no gas without a physical container, albeit ionized deuterium

I would say no/

inside a vacuum chamber

INSIDE

A

CONTAINER

He said NEXT to.

its inside

Yeah electromagnetic confinement won't work on normal air

see the steel walls cyclner

So.... wiat a minute

CONTAINEING THE ENTIRE FUCKIGN THING

So it's inside of a vacuum, but being contined by the EMF?

bro im truly alone

there is no smart people left

So it's 2 steps right?

no its inside a chamber

There's 2 containers
1. metal separating non ionized air from the vacuum.
2. electromagnetism separating ionized deuterium from the vacuum

!mute @rightthehand

Well now you're REALLY ALONE.

Because I'm not going to have you insult me after JUST WALKED IN on your converstaion.

!unmute @rightthehand

Now.

As we can all clearly see

The apparatus, is indeed contained WITHIN the vacuum

HOWEVER,

no however

It stands to reason that if the ionized gases are being contained within a particle field,

game over once you put it in a conainer

Then the vacuum IS NOT doing the actual containing.

It might be assisting,