Message from @rightthehand

Discord ID: 589050847426510858


2019-06-14 11:15:14 UTC  

So if I looked up at the Moon and said it’s pixels in the sky screen would I be presupposing that the moon is pixels in the sky screen

2019-06-14 11:15:20 UTC  

Yep

2019-06-14 11:15:23 UTC  

I said it looks like pixels on the screen and all the measurements work out

2019-06-14 11:15:31 UTC  

They don't

2019-06-14 11:15:33 UTC  

OK so you do it and it’s not presupposing I do it and it is OK I get it now

2019-06-14 11:15:41 UTC  

There is a difference

2019-06-14 11:15:43 UTC  

So it’s easy to prove the earth is a ball when you have a double standard

2019-06-14 11:16:00 UTC  

I mean I could see your presupposing mass flow to nothing and I am not because screens are real

2019-06-14 11:16:11 UTC  

I can show you screens

2019-06-14 11:16:29 UTC  

You’ll never show me anything orbiting with out pre supposing

2019-06-14 11:16:37 UTC  

I can show you a rubber duck too

2019-06-14 11:16:43 UTC  

That’s not a orbit

2019-06-14 11:16:53 UTC  

So you proved rubber ducks not Orbitz congratulations

2019-06-14 11:16:55 UTC  

Does that mean that the idea that the universe is a giant rubber duck is more likely than a long distance force?

2019-06-14 11:17:05 UTC  

But seeing how you were trying to prove that the moon is orbiting that’s not a real good accomplishment

2019-06-14 11:17:26 UTC  

Radar measurements just like we do on earth

2019-06-14 11:17:29 UTC  

Point it at the moon

2019-06-14 11:17:34 UTC  

Record distance and speed

2019-06-14 11:17:37 UTC  

Just like you car

2019-06-14 11:17:37 UTC  

I mean I know you can’t prove Orbitz without looking up and presupposing it I’m just trying to get you to understand that

2019-06-14 11:17:46 UTC  

I can touch my car

2019-06-14 11:17:51 UTC  

Pixels in a screen move

2019-06-14 11:17:56 UTC  

You don't have to know it's speed

2019-06-14 11:18:02 UTC  

All you did was time the movement and make up a speed and distance

2019-06-14 11:18:02 UTC  

The police can do that just fine without

2019-06-14 11:18:14 UTC  

They will point a similar device at you and boom....

2019-06-14 11:18:16 UTC  

You look at the moon which is a light in the screen move you timed how long it took and then made up of speed and distance

2019-06-14 11:18:26 UTC  

No we don't

2019-06-14 11:18:26 UTC  

Simple

2019-06-14 11:18:28 UTC  

Yup

2019-06-14 11:18:34 UTC  

That’s how they do it

2019-06-14 11:18:39 UTC  

We bounce radar there and back again

2019-06-14 11:18:43 UTC  

Like the police do

2019-06-14 11:18:49 UTC  

They watch all of the stars they see how long it takes for them to move then they just make up distances and speeds that work out with the times that they know it takes

2019-06-14 11:19:04 UTC  

It’s backwards engendering

2019-06-14 11:19:09 UTC  

Time first

2019-06-14 11:19:19 UTC  

Then the distances and speeds to match

2019-06-14 11:19:37 UTC  

I know this is fact because I can do nothing but look at the sky and record how long it takes each light to make its complete cycle and I could make all of the predictions that gravity does

2019-06-14 11:21:54 UTC  

in practical science, can radar actually do that though?

2019-06-14 11:22:12 UTC  

can it shoot through earth's atmosphere

2019-06-14 11:22:29 UTC  

penetrate the Van allen belts