but poles ends are round dumbass

@Derek Nelson how does the scientific method prove God

oh YeAh

anyone who ascribes to something different than the scientific method, literally wants a belief to be catered to. This isn’t a debate. When you cannot prove otherwise.

Oh we are talking about flat earth

The scientific method doesn’t prove God. It’s why it was popular among atheists.

Sorry

I literally had that method shoved down my throat 10 years ago. Now that according to our world, that method doesn’t back them, they don’t want it anymore.

How freaking convenient.

You can make up science as you go.

According to your belief.

All this stuff is from before you were born, Derek

https://youtu.be/SffJp89Ua8g?t

You know what

I have the time for once

Let's talk in <#538929818834698260> I'm back in the game

5G tower removal kit

@Human Sheeple if Huawei gets a contract in my area I'll be the first

Also how to get to prizon for destroying someones property

U.S. dollars are backed by the “full faith and credit”
of the U.S. Government.

The scientific method was a way of proving things in reality before you were a teen, Isaac.

Now you want philosophy to change that.

I dont like his name being issac newton puts me on edge

Because your beliefs don’t match proof.

What conversation is going on now?

Observable testable repeatable

Can you create anything from nothing?

If you created matter, you would need a place to put it. If you had that place to put it, when would you put it?

How can you have matter with no space? How can you have space with no time? All these things. Time, space and matter would have had to of been created simultaneously. Only way that can happen is with a designer and creator.

@Jarj the very nature of the scientific method

Oh.

The very nature of the scientific method. Observation, measurement, and experiment.. Only a cultist has a problem with it.

This guy is awesome.

One of the most influential people in history.

Francis Bacon.

Read what I said.

@Citizen Z idk. Maybe time and space and matter can exist independently, just we cant wrap our head around it. This isnt even a mainstream idea I'm just throwing it out there.

Okay.

Understand?

But yeah, Francis Bacon is the second most influential man in history.

Second to Jesus.

Is the scientific method truly the only school of logic that should be used? Is there anything else that can be trusted?

A nihilist would have a problem with it

So you cannot disprove the actuality of the scientific method. Other than character assassination.