The lightest gasses will be the first to escape into a hole at the top.

Sort of lol except for the globe part

@Seeker of Truth how does flat earth explain O3 creating a blanket at a certain elevation not higher not lower?

Were we on a ball they would all go up and escape the lightest ones first.

@rightthehand No, but I can disprove a container with it

So you can prove cause by observation

I don't know.

@Seeker of Truth You are just sooo ignorant and that is sad

@Steve Angell No, not true

that is not very nice

If you can use observation to disapprove a container and then you’ve used observation to prove there’s no container correct@ZeroT

personal attack~

What contains it from escaping?

That means I get to mute you again. ^^

Well whether you believe in gravity or not it is clear that gas doesnt go up forever it stops at a certain point depending on what gas it is

@Seeker of Truth Oh wow

???

If you can use observation to disapprove a container and then you’ve used observation to prove there’s no container correct@ZeroT

I can disprove the container by knowing the law you are all referring to and observing the exsistance of a pressure gradient

You are just disproving yourself

2nd Law of Thermodynamics

What keeps the gas from going up and escaping?

@Steve Angell A force that is called gravity

A force that contains us down here

Nothing. It is just a baseless theory.

The buoyancy theory makes no sense, because there is gravity calculated in it

@ZeroT So you can’t prove something through Observation except that there’s no container

Okay, so why do we stay on earth then?

Gravity lessens as you go up. It is simply not a proven theory that gravity would keep it from going on up to escape.

Correct?

Apparently, according to some university buffins, the air does indeed escape into space but in such minuscule amounts it not really taken into consideration @Steve Angell

@Steve Angell Gravity lessens the further you go away from it

we must stay in The World, until our time is up

So we can’t prove things through observation except by observing a pressure gradient we can prove there’s no container correct?@ZeroT

But it is soooooo unsignificant

So we can’t prove things through observation except by observing a pressure gradient we can prove there’s no container correct?@ZeroT

Did you mean 'insignificant'?

@rightthehand You just turn around words and try to sell them as mine

Yes

I am writing quick, I make mistakes

My bad