You don't even know what my beliefs are.

lol

And lies don't deserve respect.

Sorry, not fucking sorry.

i use my phone alot and ur roles wont let me go down the volume settings

I respect his beliefs, but he was a fair bit condescending about his position.

woah chat is rollin

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Still waiting for the FE'rs to explain why the other shoreline

is above the water, while it's literally at the waters level.

Sheeple has that image

Light curves up, yes?

@GandalfTheGreen done

@Human Sheeple Aye, sir. But your position is wrong

Very much wrong

It's not to scale

You see how you have the ball at the height of a man?

But it explains the angles of the light

The angles are wrong, because the HEIGHT is wrong

That's a globe head

You need to start LEVEL WITH THE WATER

Not ABOVE the water.

lets just keep to the point where nasa is fake and lying, not a globe ... lets not contradict ourself with other theories now.

Every damn flat earther I've met always does the same thing

Well the guy is at a lower elevation than the trees on the other shore

Stands up, looks across, and says "YUP, IT'S FLAT" Instead of being DOWN, LEVEL, WITH THE WATER

Because if you actually do get DOWN

LEVEL

WITH

THE

WATER

You'll see something you're really not supposed tooooo

Land curving up above the water.

Also Nomad we should soon continue our talk again soon with the Syncretism it was very interesting!
If you have time tomorrow that would be nice as it is getting late here XD

Interestiong how if you're STANDING AND TAKING PHOTOS this isn't noticed.

the purple curve indicates the water

Land curving or light curving?

@Human Sheeple I know that bud, what what i'm telling you, is your entire image is WRONG,

Because you are basing the perception off of a STANDING INDIVUAL

Of course it is, it's not to scale, it's just to explain how up curving refraction explains the angles of the observation