They use this argument that pedos aren't *necessarily* child molestors, and that it's just a sexual preference and they can choose to keep it to themselves, therefore, they should be accepted. The problem is, why would you make this argument unless you intend to molest children? If you don't intend to act on it, why make it socially acceptable?

Pity play is their biggest move. Next to that its playing people against eachother.

Read "the psychopath test" by Ron Johnson for a good and entertaining intro to it

It honestly pisses me off how soft on them society is. They only get like 4 years in prison.

They have defective amygdalas making them very impulsive. Most child molesters are oppertunistic and hyper sexual. Both traits of psychopaths

^^

Impulsive and devoid of empathy

Once again, chemical castration would solve it immediately

No T, no crime

A largely disproportionate number of ceos and politicians are psychopaths. Its a major avenue for JQ taking root. Basically bribing or blackmailing psychos who are already embedded

Psychos are the ideal blackmail puppets

The excuses leftists make for pedos are infuriating

They are the party of freaks and outcasts

One was arguing that we should have sympathy for them, since most of them were at one point themselves molested. The thing is, even if you were molested, *it's not that difficult to not become one yourself*

49 T, 90 crime <:redpill:439924063377555497>

It doesnt matter whether you can help it or not

It definitely messes you up for life, but, you're still responsible for how you choose to act on it

You are still a danger

Ehh unfortunatly prolonged mental damage or epigenetic changes from abuse are real. Nevetheless mad dogs cannot be tolerated.

The thing is, *they can help it*. It's bullshit that they can't.

>dad gets shot
>shoots guy

we must understand these keeeeds

Who cares. Not being able to help it juat makes them more dangerous

"I cant help it" makes you worse imo

Chemical castratiiiooonn. It is the answer for all criminals

^

I mean, sure, even if they couldn't help it, they should still be chemical castrated. But they *can* help it so it's not a valid argument.

Its not an argument either way

ya I agree

"My rabid dog cant help it. He didnt choose this"

To me it doesnt matter. Your dog gets rabies and you put it down

Lol, same exact argument

ultimately we gotta do what we gotta do to prevent further victimization

Let's not get into the chemical/genetic weapons theoretics on people please.

Exactly. Revenge justice is slave thinking.

Its about prevention.

How do you prevent it?

I agree. But Matt wants us to change the topic of castration.

We cant do pre crime

Let's drop the conversation please

Alllrighty

I gotta drive to work anyway