Ifkr

another team of shills come to lose debates. 1 to fail, and 3 to claim the failure is winning

also the earth is 400,000km or 238,900 miles away from the moon. So no the earth wouldn't dominate the picture because the distance is so unbelievable large. To give you an idea of how large this distance is Light the fastest thing in the universe moves at a pace of 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second). It still takes light 1.3 seconds. Sound like not alot. Well it is. In that time the light has move the entire distance of 400,000km or 238,900 miles.

you are avoiding the question

how do i see over the curve?

@Morning Dew hey why don't you shut up and let gaming geekmsay what he has to say before assuming hes just losing

you are spamming irrelevant information

You don't see over it

And no I answered Fourth amendments question

i just showed you 5 different images of seeing over the curve

so not irrelevant

and I already debunked two of them because the distance the object was seen from was insignificant compared to the circumference of the earth

you are ignoring the question, spamming irrelevant factoids, and your two shill buddies are only here to virtue signal. i can see a shill raid from a mile away

please I don't know who qjaxz is

Your answer make no sense mate based on how big the earth is relative to the moon . Secondly its the same DISTANCE from earth to the moon and yet the moon appears larger???

it is not insignificant. according to your own math, those landmarks are below the curve you believe in

Done with schills

all yours dew

The answer is a paycheck dew

the math has accounted for the curvature of the earth, and emphatically proves that i am seeing over it. i know you don’t understand, because you are regurgitating information from a handler, but you’re not convincing anyone with this little raid

Too answer your question first Brian. the moon isn't on a fixed orbit. Hence it appears bigger some seasons. its similar (on a much smaller scale) to how pluto orbits the sun on a uneven orbit sometimes being the 9th body orbiting the sun sometimes the 8th. so no the moon isn't always the same size. Also the pictures shown by you are actually enhanced and zoomed so the Earth will naturally appear bigger. I can tell its zoomed by the way because the surface of the moon is rather blurred and pixilated in places.

Now for you Dew

I want you to picture this with me ok.

i can’t wait for you to say the same thing a 3rd time

Geek the picture of earth as seen from the moon is from nasa.gov apolllo 11 mission

So if you doubt the photos ask nasa

no its not

the earth is too clear

yes it is

I just pulled it

this is a picture of earth from the Apollo 11 mission

Earthrise viewed from lunar orbit prior to landing
AS11-44-6550
Earthrise viewed from lunar orbit prior to landing

Fun fact, the only meaning for apollo is Satan

https://history.nasa.gov/ap11ann/kippsphotos/apollo.html

Care to try again?

https://tenor.com/view/freaking-out-kermit-gif-8832122

Explain why I can't put a picture in

other then roles

still waiting for an answer to how i can see over the curve you claim exists, and no “da earth is reeeally big” is not an answer, i have taken into account the size you believe in, and I am seeing over the curve you believe in. rhetorical question, i know you have no answer

On a given day, if many different cities measure the angle of the Sun at local noon, the resulting data, when combined with the known distances between cities, shows that the Earth has 180 degrees of north-south curvature. (A full range of angles will be observed if the north and south poles are included, and the day chosen is either the autumnal or spring equinox.) This is consistent with many rounded shapes, including a sphere, and is inconsistent with a flat shape.

Some claim that this experiment assumes a very distant Sun, such that the incoming rays are essentially parallel, and if a flat Earth is assumed, that the measured angles can allow one to calculate the distance to the Sun, which must be small enough that its incoming rays are not very parallel. However, if more than two relatively well-separated cities are included in the experiment, the calculation will make clear whether the Sun is distant or nearby. For example, on the equinox, the 0 degree angle from the North Pole and the 90 degree angle from the equator predict a Sun which would have to be located essentially next to the surface of a flat Earth, but the difference in angle between the equator and New York City would predict a Sun much further away if the Earth is flat. Because these results are contradictory, the surface of the Earth cannot be flat; the data is consistent with a nearly spherical Earth and a Sun which is very far away compared with the diameter of the Earth. That's your answer.