I'm following the theory

nor of orbits in general. in fact, experiments in a “vacuum” show that objects do not create anything close to the theoretical concepts you claim. attraction between objects can be explained by electromagnetism between objects in the aether. the fact that you cannot recreate the solar system in an experiment shows that your model has no basis in reality. science is the process of proving theories through experimentation. you have not proven the concept of orbits via experimentation

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/y4SIFU0Ooy1wsNtp0ZFNTA__7YNHKOMxNkEHEprPx5A/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419246750260264960/578278994638536705/relativity.jpg

The force we’re all taught to believe, when that’s not even the theory mainstream science operates by. So they can hoodwink people with wordplay and multiple definitions.

In simple terms gravity is called a force so average everyday people can understand it, moreso than spacetime bending 😑

But

It says it isn't a force

well we are not ur average joes

So why would they call it a force?

in simple terms you cannot prove your “solar system” model through experimentation. proving there is a downward force on the earth does not prove the solar system theory

Do you call fur hair

Because normal people wouldn't understand the difference

They don’t call it a force, it’s just referred to as a force 😑. Stop bending what i say to aid your arguments

CAUSE AND EFFECT

fur is just soft hair kek

Why is it referenced as a force

If it clearly says

Its not a force

Mainstream science basically has it’s own language. Like advanced mathematics do. The average person isn’t taught to understand, neither are they intended to. To keep them feeling stupid, because they haven’t been taught the languages.

you claim that space is a vacuum, and yet objects in a vacuum behave nothing like how scientists theorize that objects behave in “space.” that in itself disproves their theories

Nasa says its a force

But do we trust nasa

i do kek

Or the person who made the theory

Dictionaries call gravity a force too.

i like how globers just start posting dictionary definitions when they’re out of arguments

It’s all effing wordplay.

Shouldn't we trust the creator of the theory

Or the modernized version

The enhancement

Because the enhancement could be the right one

@Morning Dew space is a vacuum, but also has no gravity. If there is gravity on earth, and we can’t create a magical zero gravity chamber, we can’t accurately simulate space on earth

@AltHarrington we can

Nasa has a zero G gravity chamber

Scapegoats for mainstream pseudoscientists who can keep jumping back and forth between definitions on a whim, so they can say, “that’s not what I meant”, or “you have the wrong idea.”

They use it to practice

@Morning Dew All people do in other servers is post gifs that claim to prove something

you can literally create an opposite force that cancels out the downward pull, and even in that environment it behaves nothing like your theoretical “space.” the fact is, you have a theory that has not been proven through experimentation. you have proven nothing

He hasn’t been taught how to prove something.