Why is it referenced as a force

If it clearly says

Its not a force

Mainstream science basically has it’s own language. Like advanced mathematics do. The average person isn’t taught to understand, neither are they intended to. To keep them feeling stupid, because they haven’t been taught the languages.

you claim that space is a vacuum, and yet objects in a vacuum behave nothing like how scientists theorize that objects behave in “space.” that in itself disproves their theories

Nasa says its a force

But do we trust nasa

i do kek

Or the person who made the theory

Dictionaries call gravity a force too.

i like how globers just start posting dictionary definitions when they’re out of arguments

It’s all effing wordplay.

Shouldn't we trust the creator of the theory

Or the modernized version

The enhancement

Because the enhancement could be the right one

@Morning Dew space is a vacuum, but also has no gravity. If there is gravity on earth, and we can’t create a magical zero gravity chamber, we can’t accurately simulate space on earth

@AltHarrington we can

Nasa has a zero G gravity chamber

Scapegoats for mainstream pseudoscientists who can keep jumping back and forth between definitions on a whim, so they can say, “that’s not what I meant”, or “you have the wrong idea.”

They use it to practice

@Morning Dew All people do in other servers is post gifs that claim to prove something

you can literally create an opposite force that cancels out the downward pull, and even in that environment it behaves nothing like your theoretical “space.” the fact is, you have a theory that has not been proven through experimentation. you have proven nothing

He hasn’t been taught how to prove something.

OK

On purpose.

SO I GAVE TWO OPTIONS @AltHarrington

Same with the rest of us, until we learned otherwise.

ENHANCMENT OR ORIGINAL

PICK

I dont know what you’re talking about

*facepalm*

this discussion of semantics is a deflection from the things you have no answer for, and the theories you have not proven

The theory of evolution

<@330401359507619840>

lol, encyclopedia britannica is proof

Loool

You going to pick NASA's definition

Man i just came here to argue about vaccines, i know more about that than this 😑