Message from @RidleyChozo

Discord ID: 593652836529864725


2019-06-27 03:58:19 UTC  

You think everyone involved with nasa are liars

2019-06-27 03:58:28 UTC  

Buoyancy on its own does not tell you where an object would go. If a rock is more dense than the air around it, why would it fall down, or sideways, or up?
To calculate the buoyant force,: b= Pf V g
Pf= fluid density
V= volume displaced
G= gravity (you know, vector)

2019-06-27 03:58:29 UTC  

because they are

2019-06-27 03:59:13 UTC  

Yeah I though that would be the vector

2019-06-27 03:59:29 UTC  

That is how I would see it.

2019-06-27 03:59:50 UTC  

The vector can be determined by the environment it is in.

2019-06-27 03:59:50 UTC  

What gravity?

2019-06-27 04:00:05 UTC  

Lol ok @ColaCoke

2019-06-27 04:00:25 UTC  

Show me an experiment that proves gravity.

2019-06-27 04:00:45 UTC  

We could show you several, you just would say “FAKE”

2019-06-27 04:00:45 UTC  

Cavendish

2019-06-27 04:00:59 UTC  

NASA is compartmentalized. People know what they need to know. So no not all are liars some are just lied to and they believe the lies are true thus they do lie but they do not know they are lying.

2019-06-27 04:01:11 UTC  

L

2019-06-27 04:01:21 UTC  

so

2019-06-27 04:01:27 UTC  

liars

2019-06-27 04:01:42 UTC  

Tell me why density and buoyancy would tell us anything about where an object goes? I’d love to see the math.

2019-06-27 04:01:56 UTC  

@Steve Angell like with the Manhattan Project 80 years ago

2019-06-27 04:02:14 UTC  

Yes.

2019-06-27 04:02:28 UTC  

Buoyant force = Pf V (magic?)

2019-06-27 04:03:26 UTC  

How heavy the object is per cubic inch. Although there is also the elasticity of it if it is a liquid. Why some bugs can land on water and not sink.

2019-06-27 04:04:25 UTC  

: D

2019-06-27 04:04:29 UTC  

The problem he is having is in the definition of gravity. For his use of it, he requires earth to be a ball, and/or mass being attracted to mass. FE requires neither, as it already has a definite stationary point, where we have an absolute up and down, that would already determine the direction.

2019-06-27 04:04:37 UTC  

Ice we can not go through it if it is thick enough.

2019-06-27 04:05:13 UTC  

So... magic. Got it.

2019-06-27 04:05:19 UTC  

How would a flat earther calculate bouyant force

2019-06-27 04:05:28 UTC  

What do you mean magic?

2019-06-27 04:05:48 UTC  

The vector can still be changed by the environment. If a rock hits a rock it will not continue to go down. It may go sideways.

2019-06-27 04:05:48 UTC  

Earth has never even been proven that it moves. Magic math doesn’t change that.

2019-06-27 04:06:26 UTC  

@Steve Angell ice is strange because it is less dense than its liquid cousin. Most other elements/compounds are *more* dense in solid form.

2019-06-27 04:06:30 UTC  

Globe Earth exists, it's just completely undetectable

2019-06-27 04:06:48 UTC  

You can't measure it anywhere

2019-06-27 04:06:53 UTC  

You mean “I reject all of the evidence” - it’s ok to be honest.

2019-06-27 04:06:56 UTC  

But what about the photos

2019-06-27 04:06:58 UTC  

Yet there it is

2019-06-27 04:06:59 UTC  

Water expands when you make it into Ice

2019-06-27 04:07:00 UTC  

Because the oxygen in it escapes and is held by the ice.

2019-06-27 04:07:32 UTC  

Turning to ice changes it.

2019-06-27 04:07:49 UTC  

So, can anyone tell me how I can calculate the buoyant force on FE?

2019-06-27 04:07:54 UTC  

You mean ice is chemically different from liquid water?

2019-06-27 04:08:17 UTC  

Not chemically. Properties are different