Message from @Fran
Discord ID: 595689870370930738
Alchemy is about the transformation of the human soul from Lead to Gold
This is called the Magnum Opus/Great work @Steve Angell
Gravitational time dialation, gravitational redshifting, gravitational lensing.
All of these were predicted based upon GR's definition of gravity. And were experimentally verified.
Can your model account for any of these observations?
It was also about combining different matter to make gold and a whole lot more. This was a tiny fraction of what it was. Mostly it was what we now call Chemistry.
... anymore gravity deniers?
The Bible says Moses turned Gold into a powder. Most likely through some kind of magic. Like the magic he used with Pharaoh. That is Alchemy but we know not what it is. We can not do that today.
If it was then you should be able to fill this out @Shadow✓
Science does not seek to prove anything
😫
by prove I mean
Except I've already proven gravity, no need to fill out a chat particularly designed to be tedious
100% certainty
The theory made predictions and those were verified
Without our definition of gravity how could you explain all those phenomena
Density?
No one has proven gravity. No one knows what causes it
We know a whole lot about Density.
But physicists think about gravity all the time. To them, gravity is one of the mysteries to be solved in order to get a complete understanding of how the Universe works. So, what is gravity and where does it come from? To be honest, we’re not entirely sure.
https://www.universetoday.com/75705/where-does-gravity-come-from/
But Mass to Mass attraction is an unproven theory.
The box model containing gas and the globular earth atmosphere are not analogous models
Gravity is simply the curvature of spacetime due to any nonzero value of the stress-energy tensor
Yes but he is probably asking 'why is that the case'
Neil Tyson - What is Graity? On the most recent edition of his “Star Talk” radio show and podcast, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson answered the question, “What is gravity?”
“I have no idea,” he joked. “Okay, next question.” Then, he went on to explain, “Here’s the difference. We can describe gravity, we can say what it does to other things.” “We can measure it, we can predict with it,” he continued, “but when you start asking, like, what it is? I don’t know.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Efh4bu4rcbs
@Steve Angell atom inferometer, Schiehallion experiment
which is a deeper question, but the fact we can't answer that doesnt mean calling gravitational fore the stress-energy tensor is a failed model
You can ask 'why' about literally anything and reduce it to some fundamental physics question without a satisfactory answer
At some point your dealing with philosophy and epistemology however
...
See, all the physicist who say that are likely talking about the issue of quantum gravity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GT2zI8lVA video related
But that's irrelevant to our discussion because of the fact that it only involves the case were gravity is non-renormalizable.
Gravity has a perfect defined cause and effect and it's explained via a theory that can make predictions of phenomena we should observe.
We've observed such phenomena as direct results of gravity.
And have even made predictions and measured reality and observations to show our initial theory was accurate.
anyone here still think they live on a cartoon? - Robert Simmon - AKA Mr. Blue Marble
Data Visualizer and Designer Robert Simmon never thought that he would become “Mr. Blue Marble.”
My role is to make imagery from Earth sciences data. I turn data into pictures.
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html
Crafting the Blue Marble
To make the Earth look realistic, or at least how I imagined the Earth would look, I needed to do some work.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegantfigures/2011/10/06/crafting-the-blue-marble/
Compositing separate images into a convincing whole is (of course) easier said than done. Even with control of each layer in my image processing software (Photoshop) it took hours of tweaking and re-tweaking transparency, layer masks, hue, saturation, gaussian blur, and curves to get an image that looked like the picture I had in my head.
And gravity has still not been proven no matter what you say