It's conservation of momentum, a direct consequence of Newton's laws

Rockets and engines in space behave according to Isaac Newton's third law of motion: Every action produces an equal and opposite reaction. When a rocket shoots fuel out one end, this propels the rocket forward — no air is required.

Yeah

Just as if you were skating on ice and you push someone, you move backwards

likewise, start by hugging the person then pushing them, you move in opposite directions

this is what a rocket does

interesting how that cannot be replicated in an experiment, but you can make excuses for anything. just like how you can either assume there are coincidences, or realize its all already written

couldnt thrust just be thought of as recoil from a gun

It's Exactly that learning

cool

Cannot be replicated by the experiment you watched cause it was probably a loser who thinks he is a scientist

so i guess if you shot a gun in space you start moving because of the recoil. its not pushing off of anything

if you put a rocket into a vacuum, it doesn’t move. by all means, i am aware the devil has an excuse for everything, so believe what you will

correct. If you believe Newton's laws are true, you must believe momentum is conserved in isolated systems where you have only force pairs acting on the object

What kind of rocket?

your exactly like this one guy in this show who mistook a person of science for a witch

Red rockets

Red rockets chilli poppers?

its castlevania if you wanna watch it

see, someone could easily think “its a coincidence that people show up wherever I go, a series of explainable events” or you could realize that you’re being oppressed by people who don’t even realize they’re on strings. whatever you choose to believe is enforced

🤔

MOONDOG.. the rocket NEEDS THE SOLIDITY of the air in order to push on anything

Just because i understand that something can move in vacuum doesn't mean i'm not aware that some kind of elite is pulling the strings and lying about a shitload

if there is no air.. you cannot push off of it

you realize that everything is explainable by using science right?

incorrect

example

We just said you don't need the air

explain Quantum physics... or black holes

@eletrick33 not it is not

example

calm down roche, the Father sends a strong delusion to them, and they’re drawn to my presence by principalities of darkness. they may not know it, but they work to stress you out and make you angry

YOUMUST have air to produce a forward motion yes

lol

Science cannot explain the Super Natural

No you mustn't

the super natural is nonsense

Science argues that the supernatural does not exist

Playing devils advocate here

i surely am not streesed out DEW... this is my kindergarden class introduction

<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>