yeah still just theorys ..

and on galactic levels, gravity appears to be too weak.

Quantum anything

hence the invention of dark matter.

Gravity will eventually become null when the expanse of the universe breaks away the galaxies

oh

thats ungood

You have to first prove gravity scientifically before you can assert what it will or will not do

Gravity IS null and void already

But gravity has been proven a multitude of times

ok then how do you explain gravitational lending

No Newton said IF Earth is a ball... there must be gravity

Earth isn't a ball

So no gravity

it is btw

there are a lot of things that prove that

So why's my floor flat then?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/571747388960800789/571759416098029569/FlatEarth.png

LMAO

Name me one

And Newton also didn’t completely understand gravity (no shame to him)

*sigh*

i think gravitational lending proves it just fine

Cavendish Experiment?

blackholes

tides

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/CMgpVadBpUv02N0VwJdCLyWXgnCruzinoGSFJz1YjGc/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419030767356739594/479026570413998080/Cavendish.gif

do you mean lensing, @eletrick33 ?

@he vibin tho Talk about cherry picking data

yeah

that word

haha

That isn’t cherry picking?

6. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-STATIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/pfqfVww https://imgur.com/Gzv5QgW

How did you account for dielectric acceleration?

Dielectric acceleration is a by product of gravitational acceleration when in the presence of an electromagnetic field. Like I said large bodies of mass may often prove a stronger force that smaller electromagnetic forces.

you're assuming that every Cavendish experiment ever wasn't properly controlled.

But gravity is quite a weak force

@he vibin tho You can't prove gravity so how do you know dielectric acceleration is caused by grabbity?

there's been many, many recreations of Cavendish.

Observation.

because not everything is affected by electromagnetism or by magnetic fields