Yea you'd need something about as big as a house to see it on the moon from Earth @Human Sheeple

*supersonic sight*

Plus, the flag would probably be pretty parallel to your line of sight.

How about you convince us since you made the accusation

Because if you make a claim then back it up

yes, convince us, make us believe , PLEASE

Other than just saying "___GoVerNmEnT lYiNg___"

Upon whom does the burden of proof fall?

Evidence not excuses

Yes and that's some heavy burden right there

That's what will change my mind

That's my new quote "___Evidence not excuses___"

I mean you guys are the conspiracy theorist, so what makes it such a huge conspiracy

Yeah

Like I cannot accuse you of rape without evidence

Unless am a woman and your a man

Bruh that gotta get fixed ngl

OOOOOOOOOOH

Usually you're not tipping well enough

@Human Sheeple he answered your question about not seeing the flag

You don't see a flag do you?

Neither do I

But I don't have supersonic sight do you?

@Human Sheeple ikr, when someone calls you a conspiracy theorist

Pete is a cun t

You have no reason to claim the moon landing is fake

And if you do what are they

"WhY cAn'T We sEe FoReVeR oN FE?" Same reason you can't see the flag.

Exactly

I remember the days when i heard all the reason it was real

The same reason you cannot see my sitting here bored with nothing to do

We need to go to the moon

Primarly to setup a moon base

Is cun t a bad word

For many reasons

I tried saying a s s

@Human Sheeple T he flag is 125 cm (4 feet) long, and you would need an optical wavelength telescope around 200 meters (~650 feet) in diameter to see it. The largest optical wavelength telescope that we have now is the Keck Telescope in Hawaii which is 10 meters in diameter. The Hubble Space Telescope is only 2.4 meters in diameter - much too small!

A ss

A Red Bull ad parodying Apollo 11 is on my TV right now XD