i like the (at least not flat)

And Tyson says 2 sticks supports a globe and flat earth l, but 3 sticks disproves a flat earth. Smdh

so yeah, with 3 sticks i feel like it gets too small to measure

proving earth is round 1. assume not flat

2. win

like saying gravity exists too but it's too small to measure

so 1. assume it exists

how do you put a picture?

where can i find gravity

i might not have that ability

i only know that links turn into pictures

Depends. What characteristics are you looking for?

i found no gravity

only a bunch of bs

i'm looking for ones that distinguish it from things falling on a flat earth

its density

i think relative density is caused by falling. either way it doesn't need gravity

i think density causes it to fall

maybee but i have questions with it like

what happens if density of surroundings is 0

you mean a vacuum?

you mean like a vacuum?

yeah, i guess why wouldn't denser things fall faster in a vacuum

we can create vacuums on earth even if one believes space to not exist

Evident by centrifuge experiments buoyant forces assume the system is under a force. Thus buoyancy in no way could be thw force downward

Brain cox proved denser items do fall faster in a vacuum

relative density is not exactly just buoyancy tho

and i agree, i think relative density can be a thing but maybe not the cause

Plus in a vacuum things still fall so theres no way it could only be density

i think things fall uniformly

the cause that things fall down

The cause of density would be molecular weight

and interactions between things falling causes relative density. just my opinion

you are assuming they are pulled

i am, and i don't know why they are pulled

Without air resistance absolutely not

but the globe doesn't know why gravity happens either

pulled vs falling is different i think

Good point um

more like the tendency to go down

in a sense yeah too, "pull" sometimes means force