That's a good one seeker

also erasthones did not know to assume parallel sun rays

He assumed the sun was an infinite distance away with parallel rays

erasthones did

?

i'll have to check

Pretty sure

if that's true then that's a bad proof

cause he does just ignore a local sun

Yeah

i like the (at least not flat)

And Tyson says 2 sticks supports a globe and flat earth l, but 3 sticks disproves a flat earth. Smdh

so yeah, with 3 sticks i feel like it gets too small to measure

proving earth is round 1. assume not flat

2. win

like saying gravity exists too but it's too small to measure

so 1. assume it exists

how do you put a picture?

where can i find gravity

i might not have that ability

i only know that links turn into pictures

Depends. What characteristics are you looking for?

i found no gravity

only a bunch of bs

i'm looking for ones that distinguish it from things falling on a flat earth

its density

i think relative density is caused by falling. either way it doesn't need gravity

i think density causes it to fall

maybee but i have questions with it like

what happens if density of surroundings is 0

you mean a vacuum?

you mean like a vacuum?

yeah, i guess why wouldn't denser things fall faster in a vacuum

we can create vacuums on earth even if one believes space to not exist

Evident by centrifuge experiments buoyant forces assume the system is under a force. Thus buoyancy in no way could be thw force downward

Brain cox proved denser items do fall faster in a vacuum

relative density is not exactly just buoyancy tho

and i agree, i think relative density can be a thing but maybe not the cause

Plus in a vacuum things still fall so theres no way it could only be density

i think things fall uniformly