I'm asking about standards of evidence

You know there is many lies

Howndo we determine the lies

It can't be based on how easy it to go somewhere

Discernment

What evidence exists for Arctic midnight sun

Pictures video, anything else?

For me or you right this second...

For me, first of all, I ask myself why would people lie about these things. I don't think flat earthers think that way. They seem to assume that somebody is definitely lying

Hear say and video

@Citizen Z is that sufficient?

No but

There is video of bigfoot and earth from space

And of the same thing in Antarctica

And hearsay , before video was a thing

I know from being in different latitudes the sun angle changes

In the north

K, that's true

Personally

And in the south too

Yes

But what does that tell you about the sun in the Arctic

That it would change from here to there

Standards of evidence, huh? That's through scientific demonstration. But if you assume scientists engage in an elaborate, long-lasting, worldwide lie there's no helping you really

So an extrapolation?

Using a model

Who says its an elaborate lie

It could be a giant mistake mostly

With some lies

Not sure how someone could accidentally comenupmwith an accurate map

Of the whole world

What map is that?

All the maps we use for navigation

To get from place to place

Like which ones?

Google maps

Just the world map

Which is used the most?

Wgs84 is a good choice

All of the scientific explanations that are given and easily researchable to support the globe model makes it pretty darn elaborate and worldwide at that

Google maps seems ok doesnt it