Message from @eletrick33
Discord ID: 621729875136610304
Yss
I agrew
Agree*
Wait Rigg5.0 just left?
debate no ice wall chodes
"There are cruise ships to Antarctica" yet somehow nasa (an organization that is unrelated to military pressure) both erases peoples memories of only select specific times and only those times (permanently) then also fills their brain with completely clear memories of their trip to Antarctica will leaving the brain relatively and to completely all observable features unharmed. Perhaps we should start with actual explanation on that. It's all itself a logical fallacy with the puzzle pieces crushed and flex taped together. Yet somehow ships can get into and out of Antarctica just fine along with research groups that can and have actually studied the life and environment for a very long time. Along with the dome having actual no need of protection- because its an actual dome.
What
Talk about fallacies
hey i am a gay man and would like to speak with someone about why it is bad to be gay because i would like to be converted so i can be loved by god. Dm me please😃
"Civil debate"... Not "troll section" @ŠṪÓŘM#7818
he's gone, he was probably banned
here
Here
Thanks for joining this chat
yeah np
So, pull up the definition of freedom again and let's examine it
alright
Let's start with (1) act
Can I walk across an imaginary border without a permit?
Keywords: "without restraint"
😉
your freedom ends where someone else's freedom starts though
@Akhanyatin freedom is just an illusion
ok, wtv you say
well assuming that your talking about borders like the mexico and america border then no you cant go across without a permit but if were talking about the U.S state border then yes you can walk across freely
um can you elaborate on that
you're free to do wtv you want, but accept the consequences
we are in fact able to act freely
exactly
if we didnt have laws then it would be anarchy and thats never good
you're free to punch the president in the face. but don't expect to walk away scot-free
yeah
you're free to go hit someone, that someone is free to defend themselves
remember its not anarchy
we have laws
Without hindrance or restraint
so you want to be free to hit a person but that person shouldn't be free to defend themselves?
@Akhanyatinstrawman
i think thats what hes getting at