We should like move the Amazon fire to the edge of the world so it melts the ice

We are getting out of point tho

You see I believe that earth is a cube because 2+2=4-1=3 and that's quick math

what do you see when you reach a corner of the earth

Space duh

If you jump you fall down

In space

!mute @LolCat troll and fake flat earther

!mute @Echo_N_Enzo troll

Poof

@California Nightmare 2.0 sorry to ping you, but I am back home now, do you wish to continue our debate?

Can’t
I’m busy currently

Perhaps later

Ok

well technically you never reach the "edge" of earth because earth is a sphere and there are infinitely many "edges" on a sphere so you never reach the "edge" of earth because of gravity, perspective, and simple geometry

however if you keep going up from your point of view then yes @Echo_N_Enzo you would see space

Tbh it would be cool if the earth was flat

And there where and indestructible dome protecting us

true

unfortunately i don't believe in god so that doesn't even have any baseline proof for a dome

meanwhile there is mountains of evidence for the globe

but i see what you're saying

.

wow

no swearing

anyways

it would be awesome if we did tho

lol

no more astroids amir?

Impossible as light speed as far as i know

Well at least with my and our physics knowledge

So, one of the reasons I can't believe in a flat earth is that it doesn't work with plate tectonics

if we're a disk flying upwards through space, either the disk has a molten core driving the processes, in which case, why doesn't the magma melt its way down and fall out of the world?, or tectonic processes are a hoax, which, the globalists or whomever's to blame would have to had planted not just the fossils, but *all* the rocks and soils known to geology

unless there's a flat earther theory of geological processes, in which case, I'd be very interested

flat earth also doesn't account for gravitational anomalies. Certain regions of the earth do have slightly higher and slightly lower gravities and a flat plane/disk flying upwards doesn't account for that.

Finally, I've been to the observation deck of the new WTC and I've seen the curve. Now, if the window's a subtle fish-eye lens, the other buildings ought to be slightly distorted too, but they're not. If it's a screen, well, I've seen flecks of windblown dust on the glass so that must be a hella advanced screen. At that cost, why would they go through the trouble in the first place?

Hmmmmm, what about gravity?

Wouldn't that justify the core (which would also be plane I think) of a flat earth?