Ok

I don't have all of the answers, but this is what I gather from it.

I see

We don't really know how deep the earth goes.

Though globers can say otherwise.

There are intense crystal caverns spiraling down miles into the earth, massive cave systems, entire bodies of water underground.

Ok

Like in Minecraft

Somewhat, but bigger.

And more detailed.

Another thing, scientists discovered new layers of rock and sediment that they didn't think existed. This was by digging themselves.

@hamed473 Because it's still within the sun's gravitational field. It's just the field is weaker that far out. I have a great little video that demonstrates GR gravity well using spandex as an analogue to spacetime.
https://youtu.be/cHySqQtb-rk
I totally missed your last point! I don't think it IS prohibited to go to the south pole. Is there something that says it is?

So predictions can only get you so far.

They are helpful, but not 100% accurate.

I must go for now, catch you all later.

Later

except those predictions are based on facts and observations and our knowledge of how physics works, you can't really compare globe model prediction to hollow earth "predictions" since hollow earth doesn't make accurate predictions
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-do-scientists-determi-2005-07-25/

honestly i dont even know why i joined this server,i mean the earth is clearly round and idk i mean people can HAVE their own opinions but why do so many people think that like clearly its round i mean there isnt an edge,if the earth is flat we wouldnt have a DEEP underground etc etc

i mean honestly im not trying to argue but there cant be theories on something that is already scientificcaly proven with facts

Nothing is ever *scientifically proven*.

If you’ve ever taken a trip out of the country, specifically long-distance trips, you could notice an interesting fact about planes and the Earth:

Planes can travel in a relatively straight line for a very long time and not fall off any edges. They can also circle the Earth without stopping.

Without being in the sky, it is impossible to see the curvature of the Earth. However, you can always see a demonstration of this if you visit a harbor or any place with a wide-open view of the water.

If you are able to watch a ship sail off to sea, watch its mast and flag as it fades off into the distance. You will notice that, in fact, it does not "fade off into the distance" at all; instead, you will see its mast and flag appear to slowly sink. The ship sailed beyond the point at which you would see it. Just to be sure, bring a pair of binoculars with you so that you can see even farther off into the distance.

It's as if you're watching it go over to the other side of a hill. This phenomenon can only be explained by a sphere-shaped planet.

if thats not proof idk what is

This is a tired argument. Flat earthers have a wide variety of arguments they use to dispute this claim. Check out <#484516084846952451> and scroll way, way up to get familiar with 'em.

@🎃Oakheart🎃 here is what happens

there is an earthquake in one part of the world

the shear waves travel through the earth, except for the core because they csnt go through liquids

the p waves, preassure waves, can go through liquids. They travel at the speed of sound through the medium they are traveling in, so we can use this to predict what the Earth is made of

@Riley "Predict" But who is giving this information. Earthquakes can only go so deep, there are magma pockets that reverberate/block the waves from going to deep, the inner earth exists deep below that point.

*"To scientists, one of the more fascinating findings to emerge from this well is that no transition from granite to basalt was found at the depth of about 7 km (4.3 mi), where the velocity of seismic waves has a discontinuity. Instead the change in the seismic wave velocity is caused by a metamorphic transition in the granite rock. In addition, the rock at that depth had been thoroughly fractured and was saturated with water, which was surprising. This water, unlike surface water, must have come from deep-crust minerals and had been unable to reach the surface because of a layer of impermeable rock."* Alan Bellows (5 March 2007). "The Deepest Hole". Damn Interesting. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
G. J. MacDonald (1988).

They didn't even know there was water down there.

So how could they possibly know about an inner Earth land?

And that's only within 7 miles.

Imagine hundreds of miles.

When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim. One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by committing a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance. It occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proved false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proved true. A negative claim is a colloquialism for an affirmative claim that asserts the non-existence or exclusion of something. The difference with a positive claim is that it takes only a single example to demonstrate such a positive assertion ("there is a chair in this room," requires pointing to a single chair), while the inability to give examples demonstrates that the speaker has not yet found or noticed examples rather than demonstrates that no examples exist (the negative claim that a species is extinct may be disproved by a single surviving example or proven with omniscience). The argument from ignorance is a logical fallacy. There can be multiple claims within a debate. Nevertheless, it has been said whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim.

A negative claim may or may not exist as a counterpoint to a previous claim. A proof of impossibility or an evidence of absence argument are typical methods to fulfill the burden of proof for a negative claim.

@Drewski4343 @🎃Oakheart🎃

👌

how are ya doing drew?

I've been better lol. Stayed home sick for two days. Working now, but throat's still sore.

how you doing?

that sucks, i hope it isnt migrating to your lungs