Message from @he vibin tho

Discord ID: 632024099232677888


2019-10-11 01:15:18 UTC  

Oh man Oak you know how to tell a good one that's for sure

2019-10-11 01:15:21 UTC  

we arent the only creatures

2019-10-11 01:15:35 UTC  

you forgot about dogs

2019-10-11 01:15:45 UTC  

Thats what you guys perpetuate.

2019-10-11 01:15:52 UTC  

@oƃǝW I think quantum mechanics makes perfect sense when you are able to model all particles as waves that are always at the speed of light, but in 4 or more dimensions.

2019-10-11 01:15:56 UTC  

@oƃǝW When you say that subatomic particles dont make sense. Are you disregarding quantum entanglement and their observable effects? This is direct data that we can observer. Sure, they act strangely, but nonetheless it is indeed an occurance

2019-10-11 01:16:16 UTC  

all Im saying is that they act strangely

2019-10-11 01:16:24 UTC  

they do

2019-10-11 01:16:25 UTC  

i dont know much aside from the basics

2019-10-11 01:16:28 UTC  

And when you are able to break down the wave fronts into their component 'intersection' waves which are each faster than the speed of light.

2019-10-11 01:16:35 UTC  

that doesnt make them any less real

2019-10-11 01:16:57 UTC  

i feel like you're trying to make an argument, but i dont really know what it's about

2019-10-11 01:17:09 UTC  

@oƃǝW I was the same way before I got into QM. You just need to start reading about it.

2019-10-11 01:17:20 UTC  

you joined in on another convo i was having

2019-10-11 01:17:42 UTC  

I can link you to some books

2019-10-11 01:17:43 UTC  

for me, there's nothing really strange about quantum mechanics

2019-10-11 01:17:49 UTC  

how so

2019-10-11 01:17:53 UTC  

ah yeah, i was just trying to take the place of the other person because they seemed unwilling to discuss the topic

2019-10-11 01:18:01 UTC  

QM is very strange

2019-10-11 01:18:05 UTC  

it's how people interpret quantum mechanics thats very strange

2019-10-11 01:18:07 UTC  

I still dont understand QM and i have been on it for almost a year 😦

2019-10-11 01:18:28 UTC  

it goes against our everyday logic

2019-10-11 01:18:35 UTC  

there was a quote...something about if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't

2019-10-11 01:18:36 UTC  

lmao

2019-10-11 01:18:41 UTC  

@ShyGuyfromUpHigh not if you break it down into waves

2019-10-11 01:18:42 UTC  

I still don't see what this has to do with simulation universe

2019-10-11 01:18:44 UTC  

The universe is indeed a strange place

2019-10-11 01:19:03 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/632024333824294913/Flat-Earth-Memes-24.png

2019-10-11 01:19:07 UTC  

a "particle" is the sum of an infinite number of waves

2019-10-11 01:19:33 UTC  

do you understand that ?

2019-10-11 01:19:38 UTC  

Hey, that FLAT horizon looks pretty curved to me

2019-10-11 01:19:45 UTC  

or are you repeating it?

2019-10-11 01:20:02 UTC  

earth aint flat

2019-10-11 01:20:21 UTC  

Love how in NASA's official images, the ISS and other satellites are curved.

2019-10-11 01:20:25 UTC  

do 'who' understand 'what'?

2019-10-11 01:20:31 UTC  

Fish eye lense.

2019-10-11 01:20:51 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/632024785517281290/ECT8WfP.png

2019-10-11 01:20:55 UTC  

@he vibin tho Whats your thoughts on a simulated universe

2019-10-11 01:21:50 UTC  

"Simulation earth", "simulation universe" it really doesn't matter what you call it since either way the whole thing is simulated

2019-10-11 01:21:52 UTC  

Have you ever heard of the Fourier Series?

2019-10-11 01:22:38 UTC  

"at least one of the following propositions is true: (1)
the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a
“posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely
to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or
variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer
simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that
we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor‐simulations is
false, unless we are currently living in a simulation." I agree with the 3rd proposition @ShyGuyfromUpHigh