So @Logrian what did I do wrong in my math? Why am I wrong?

Bye

Baller has a totally different meaning

Thats because mathieus bases his believe in faith anf not actual evidence @ShyGuyfromUpHigh

Because you dont know what the curvature should be at 900 miles, sad!

Crowder, Gulf of Tonkin too, 🙂

You know that's not what he meant

You're nitpicking

Lol

Taking things literally when it suits you

...oh your right it’s a smaller number

Nope, he is an indeologue, with stockholm syndrome for ballz 😄

It’s around 200

More insults and ad hominems @Logrian

its 125, sigh!

I said around

What is wrong with balls

Hush troll @oƃǝW

Which means the percentage would drop even lower

But thats not what is observed!

Logged, do you believe in atoms?

The measurement problem says no we shouldnt 🙂

Logged, do you think atoms exist?

Research Measurement Problem you little oik!

Alright I will.

good lad

Gimme link

You don't even know what point he's trying to make and you immediately refute it...once again, pretending you know what logical fallacies are. If you're not going to contribute to the argument, just shut up. @Mathieus the Walking Witness

@Logrian can you give me link

The measurement/observer problem is at the heart of quantum mechanics paradoxes. Quantum mechanics, and the Schrodinger equation that describes the superposition of states, has no explanation for how measurement by an experimenter/observer can reduce the system to just one classical state.

They donty exist unless theyre OBSERVED

Im starting to believe mathieus doesn't even have evidence for fe and is just here to name call instead of debating

Nope

Oh your talking about quantum mechanics and when we observe it.
That had to do with Probability.

Thats what the scientists say 😉

Anyway, no more shifting goal posts

There is no observable curvature, anywhere 🙂

Youre not even doing that you just name call @Mathieus the Walking Witness

ikr

Out of all the obnoxious flat earthers i have met online, you're the one that I can't stand the most. Congrats. I'm leaving. @Mathieus the Walking Witness

Okay we still don’t understand quantum mechanics, but here’s how I learned it it’s an analogy.