Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 632952101990825984
I am originally from a place near Chernobyl... And I could see the effects even after 20 years...
no, the americans made something terrible but was it a nuke ?
This isn't even conspiracy denial anymore, this is history denial.
I'm sorry, what?
Do you even understand what a nuke is?
How about those of you who decide you are correct leave
You have to understand a subject before you deny it. Posting the basic definition of a nuke isn't enough
Lets just not bother with your fantasy
It is the same when you don't like what one writes and you mute them.
Rude
it's his server he can mute anyone he wants
why not ?
Think about it from my perspective. Someone is denying a tragedy without solid evidence, and denying that very meticulate science that is very extensively studied simply doesn't exist. I have a basic idea of how nukes work, and it is something that can be replicated by anyone with the know-how and the right materials, that's why enriched uranium is really difficult to get ahold of.
What evidence do you have
Let me ask you, how do you think one could lie about the mechanisms within nukes that allow them to work? @H8mz88
Nukes cannot be replicated
U cant build a nuke and you never will build one
Large-scale nukes can't be because of how expensive the materials required are. But. Anyone could make a smaller scale bomb with similar methods. The FBI monitors anyone who buys materials that could potentially lead to one because of how dangerous it is
Your extensive studying could all be fake
Okay. But that also means your extensive study can all be fake
Go make one..see what happens
Not everything can be replicated at home...just because you can't remake it as an amateur in the field doesn't mean you can deny it. You can't build a skyscraper. Let's say you live in a rural area and have never been to the city and only seen pictures of them. That doesn't make them fake, or give you a reason to deny their existence.
Skyscrapers are really incredible structures and require many, many smart engineers to build. No one can replicate such a structure without the help of professionals and a millions of dollars- budget...they also require government approval to build.
But we both know that skyscrapers exist...right?
There was a fellow that I saw. He made videos conspiring about airplanes. He said that the airplanes you see in the sky are actually 'sky demons'. They supposedly disguise themselves as airplanes and patrol the skies overhead. His proof? He took zoomed in photographs of airplanes, and since the resolution was so low, some features didn't appear as they do on a normal plane. He then concluded that it was because the plane was a fake. This is an extreme case, but it adds to my point.
Skyscrapers are real so that means nukes are real
Look at these pictures
Real. Cuz photo
Thank you for unmuting me.
Yes
While faries wouldn't be physically possible in the form that they're usually found on TV, unicorns might be. Genetic modification could at some point become advanced enough that we could splice horse genes with narwhal genes and make them grow a horn on their head...
If we couldn't take pictures of things, the world would be a very different place. Flat earthers rely on video as well as literary evidence for all of their proof - as does the entire world. Because fake pictures exist, it doesn't give you a license to call any picture evidence you see as fake.
A more accurate usage of the term 'fake picture' would be, an unverifiable picture. A picture of a mermaid on a unicorn is not verifiable evidence for their existence in reality, not because of the picture being fake necessarily, but because we know that they are biologically impossible creatures. An image of a skycraper is a verifiable picture because one can go to that location and confirm it themselves. Just the way images of nukes are verifiable because they were confirmed to be observed by verifiable sources, AKA, real people. However, nuke deniers would have to attack the credibiiltiy of the witnesses in order to be able to deny their existence - that still doesn't make images and video of nukes inherently fake, or comparable to images of unicorns.