I remember my introduction to analytical mechanics. And my text book name was "Classical Mechanics"

its a pretty interesting case where mindlessly using F = dp/dt uterlly fails lol

I remember how stressful that class was lol

my pure maths classes are a breeze compared to my physics classes lol

we had two pages to work out each problem

the problem was simple, but it took up to two pages to solve

and that's writing tiny

we are using taylor which is like the standard pedagogical classical mech book but my prof writes his own insanely difficult problems

What do you want to know, if we are talking about what pertains to our current topic here what I “know”: The van Allen belts natural radiations we recognize far before the Apollo missions, the easy solution to avoid these belts would be to remain under an altitude of 300 nautical miles. Also, these belts are absent over north and south magnetic poles. The South Atlantic anomaly is another factor of the belts because the geomagnetic field draws particles closer to the Earth than other regions. The amount of radiation dosage can be received by looking at the orbit inclination of a space craft and by determining the passes of the belt per day.

Lagrange, or however you spell it, that stuff oof

lol look how he switched subjects, didn't you know '' a lot '' about rocket science?

rocket science is boring

@Skeptic Ayy we do, what are you struggling with

We were talking about the van allen belts, is your brain ok?

newton could have done it

Maybe reread the conversation

-I probably know much more about rocket science and the Apollo mission than you think you do
Ahem Dunning Kruger effect
did you forget your statement?

You can go around the van allen belt

literally dunning Kruger effect, how ironic

Rocket science is broad, what aspect do you want to know about

ok

lol hi kiwi

hihi

Cmon, what is it you want to know

Apollo denier

whats goin on here?

tell me anything that you learned, you said you know a lot

people trying to debate

or you can retract your statement

why do space missions usually launch heading east?

lmao as always

(not always, but more times than not)

Well I guess we can talk about orbital mechanics then since that is what I am recently learning

supposedly it saves a little bit more fuel heading east than west

lmfao this kid knows nothing, don't make that statement kay?

Can we start with Kepler's Law?

-Tries to flex with '' i know rocket science''
-Gets asked '' what do you know? ''
-Suddenly switches subject to van allen belt

So essentially we are talking about a centered inertial earth frame of XYZ and a non centered inertial frame of X’Y’Z’ which have a topocentric horizon frame of xyz attached to any point on the Earths surface.

Point O which is any point of the surface of the earth coincides instantaneously with the origin which is known as a topocentric horizon coordinate system xyz

oh boy, no no. I deal enough with spherical coordinate transformations at work on a daily basis