@oƃǝW is right

flat earthers either don't account for refraction, or don't measure it properly

not in hundreds of experiments

not in Robotham's findings over 100 years ago

Was robotham telling the truth?

ah magical refraction

*hundreds of amateur experiments in which the observer didn't properly account for variable factors

I dunno. The sphere maps give accurate headings distances and locations

I say that Trump's these suspicious flat Earth "experiments"

Seems like the atmosphere disturbs light

Does that mean any laser test done by flat Earthers needs to be thrown out

you can do your own test w/ a mirror and a friend

and a 10 mile body of water

stand at water level with each other, shine the sun in the mirror and if the other can see it, there's no curve

K what would that prove, when we know the atmosphere messes with light

at 10 miles there should be 6.6 stories of bulge/curvature

Non sequitur

I can see laser light from a source when standing behind it

Its compression refraction. Things dont pop way up into the sky

so it will bounce the light over a 6.6 story object? I dont think so

logos kirby, the kirby of knowledge

Or you just see it shining, like lights from a city far away

Without seeing the bldgs themselves

lol

christian kirby

the sun's light is interesting too

https://media.giphy.com/media/ZGI5Q1PMzuMbcibrSw/giphy.mp4

makes sense in a simplistic logic

that's the perk of flat earth

it's simple

elegant

I think that's why it's getting so popular

elegant things are complex things

but that's relative af

https://media.giphy.com/media/VG8DtqWKff684efmUo/giphy-downsized-large.gif

@RidleyChozo crepuscular rays appear behind leaves Ina forest, so those don't mean anything you think they mean

oh hai

@RidleyChozo gonna do soem planetary imaging with that?

Why does the U.S. governement hides the truth about flat earth ?