experiences

can we agree that religion shouldnt be used to make scientific proof or claims

doctrines, principles, morals

etc

yes

there is a lot of reasons why people can't agree with something

So you're saying that a "house divided" should be better than one together

depends

On

@Ronin no. The bible is a scientific book like it or not

no it isnt

hahahahaa

It is. It contains cosmology ahead of its time and mad wisdom

Where?

what I am saying is that we haven't figured out the theory of everything for us to agree on everything universally, we don't know what's the correct thing to do, we just have theories based on experiences which discard a lot of variables

So

What is so bad about agreeing on everything

as I said

no it contains explanations for stuff which people couldnt explain with actual science so they made things up to explain stuff we can now explain with science

we can't because we don't know what's the best way to do everything

Ok, most theory's saying god doesn't exist has more evidence than the ones saying god dose exist

Who says we don't know the correct way

And how do we know that we don't know the best way to do everything

Not agreeing leads to wars deaths casualties

simple, there is no utopia with all questions answered

because if we knew the best way we wouldnt be having this convo would we

If god didnt exist u wouldnt be human. U would be a mindless ant or some organism

"Not agreeing leads to wars deaths casualties" this is definetly not true

That would be a society of gods @Vitmar

that's wy we need debate

The crusade

and democracy

no if god existed, we'd be perfect

@Atlas the Friendly Robot indeed

How would we e mindless ants

But if we can't all agree

Then why should we have democracy

If some people don't like it

because that's not the point of democracy

If god didnt exist u would have no morals

Morals are made by experiance