well yeah, I'm not going to use the pyramid earth model to debunk you since it's as false as your model lol

i sent you a video, did you watch it? @Teddy

@Mathieus the Walking Witness cute ad hom, shame you can't defend your ideas without them

@Teddy have you ever observed water to curve? laser experiment, bedford level experiment, horizon never curves, 8 inch per miles curve missing EVERYWHERE

@Mathieus the Walking Witness block me because the truth hurts your religion

@Teddy here's liquid being controlled without a physical matter container
https://youtu.be/kL8R8SfuXp8

@Mathieus the Walking Witness your definition of troll: "someone who proves me wrong"

except your own videos are literally the definition of confirmation bias.

Speaking of testing things for yourself, you can spot the ISS using an amateur telescope @Teddy

but you tests arn't even tests

No need to trust pictures online.

@Teddy laser experiment is you take a strong laser and go to a huge field where you are parralel to the ground and pointing to another person and. take out the measurements and see that there is no curve. bedford level experiment is a little bit more complicated than that look it up. look up 200 reason why the earth is not a spinning globe by eric dubay

^ flat earthers have attempted this experiment in the past, and have failed

yup

I have seen this experiment demonstrated twice. Once on national geographic, at which flat earthers claimed it was fake. And second, done by flat earthers themselves near the end of the flat Earth documentary on Netflix.

bru

not cool bru

Memes don't make your opinion stronger.

No @Teddy

See: Coriolis effect

You have no proof for that @Mathieus the Walking Witness

@Mathieus the Walking Witness have you even said 1 logical thing since we started?

yeah the documentary cut out all the important parts of the test and just went to the results, its all bs. do the tests yourself

@Teddy If there's anything you can learn from this debate it's that you yourself have to do your own research and please please please check your sources you cannot just take random test that some person is done the garage and take them as facts of the universe.

@rivenator12113 Well the results concluded that the Earth was round so I don't really see why they need to do the whole process if it proves your theory wrong

Also, curvature calculators. Flat earthers often claim that this proves that the earth is flat because it is inaccurate. The thing is, they don't account for atmospheric refraction in their calculations. You can perform your own tests and find calculate how much of an object in the distance should be hidden quite accurately. @Teddy

@Mathieus the Walking Witness it's ok, don't give up, maybe one day you'll understand basic things like shapes and words

The sun on the flat Earth model also does impossible things. On a flat plane, as the sun gets further away, it would not go below the horizon if it was all flat. It would fade into the distance slowly.

it's actually hilarious how you repeat the same exact things over and over again thinking you've won

you have yet to say one logical thing

Its impossible on a flat surface for an object above that surface to visibly go below it.

Simply from moving further away, ofc

Boats also disappear over the horizon bottom up, interestingly. Just like with the sun, they should not have a preferred direction of fading into the distance.

@Yabai funny how you ignore refraction when it benefits you

what are you talking about

Atmospheric refraction already allows for us to see the boat further away than we normally would. Atmospheric refraction doesn't cause boats to disappear bottom up, as far as I'm concerned.

@rivenator12113 funny how you attribute random things to refraction when it suits you

atmospheric refraction creates an illusion of boats going from top to down

Top to down?

notice how the image in your diagram is INVERTED

never seen a boat randomly flip lol