You sent your defining features of life and they aren't present at the time of conception

> https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html
> https://www.wired.com/2015/10/science-cant-say-babys-life-begins/amp
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/abortion/child/alive_1.shtml
>
> @georgepenny#4187 your claim yesterday about when human life begins isint correct. Scientists haven't figured an exact date yet
@justkaus @George Penny you can read these for more info

Good point

Fascinating

i mean

> @GussTR no because you are thinking conception is the moment a new life is created. Think of it more like, a mold starts to form, the life gets filled in later
@justkaus

then again

its a human at conception

it has human dna

and human cells

and cells are alive

making it a human life

not a person or anything

but human

I am pretty sure this is some sort of logical fallacy

how so

am i wrong about it being human

GG @Mr.Respect, you just advanced to level 6!

or alive

Cells being alive doesn't equate to the whole being alive

i mean

is it made of anything other than cells

its not a person i get that

but by definition it is human

a developing human

> but by definition it is human
@Mr.Respect which definition exactly?

by dna

worded it wrongly

Well, I guess you are right

and even then

It is human

most and almost no abortions happpen at that stage

But when is it alive?

as a human?

Yea

embryo id say

either way

why do you think its ok to abort it

> embryo id say
@Mr.Respect that's what I am trying to tell, scientists haven't come to conclusion yet. All we know is, it isint alive till quite some time after conception

> why do you think its ok to abort it
@Mr.Respect I literally didn't say that anywhere

wait what