Message from @Soldz (CF)
Discord ID: 607257867950489600
no tattoos (slave / prisoner marks) no piercings (no rings to hear their god El, the Lord of the Rings, etc.)
Nick you can argue all day but the statistics back me up all day long. Were there a few cases where it did not work, sure. But there were FEW.
It wasn't treated in the way you think, for that long time people have been forced to hold it back and not be who they are or face public backlash and most didn't want to face it so they just held it in for their lifespan @Brian (Fourth Amendment)
By and large it was treated and it was effective
it is getting so hard to find a natural untarnished pure person these days - what a shame
Soldz, I would agree with that up to the 90's after that, not so much. And we were still successfully treating this long after it was safe to come out of the closet
the biggest issue is thinking any of this belongs anywhere around children. leave them the fuck alone
Pure people exist? <:lul:484994724118134784>
Bieber reported a 27% success ratefrom long-term therapy, but only 18% of the patients in whom Bieber considered the treatment successfulhad been exclusively homosexual to begin with, while 50% had been bisexual. In Haldeman's view, this makes even Bieber's unimpressive claims of success misleading
-wikepedia
and another thing, people shouldn't cut their hair... well remove their hair
that goes for Wombman as well - if it wasn't needed / supposed to be there then it wouldn't grow
Look at studies, not wikipedia, Nick
Just a piece of advice friend.
@Brian (Fourth Amendment) No again the people who did these "treatments" were heavily biased and the people being "treated" still had a certain stigma around it
Wikipedia sources a study
That's what it's there for
An array of sources condensed into an article
I dont trust wikipedia as a source, hold over from the days anyone could edit an article
lol
Im old hehe
If you don't trust the article look at the things it sources
Like being gay is a disease and shit
^
being gay often spreads disease
Lmao
It's a bunch of nonsense and it worked for that time period because people accepted it
Being gay is NOT a disease but it certainly did help spread HIV and Aids faster
That's why if two guys want to be gay they have to consent to the fact that they'll probably get hiv
I personally dont like the lifestyle the LGBT people live but I still love them
True @NickC64
sexual immorality of any kind destroys society.
But it's also not that simple either @NickC64
If they get HIV they should also accept that they can't have sex again
Either literally or morally
If one of my 4 kids turn out to be Gay I will be sad and afraid for them but I will still love them.
Love is important folks.
One thing I am sure we can all agree on
NickC64#4200 LANGUAGE!!!
Alright then