God made man and woman, he did not make them interchangeable and fluid.

By for example going for "treatment" and marrying the opposite sex

None worked

no tattoos (slave / prisoner marks) no piercings (no rings to hear their god El, the Lord of the Rings, etc.)

Nick you can argue all day but the statistics back me up all day long. Were there a few cases where it did not work, sure. But there were FEW.

It wasn't treated in the way you think, for that long time people have been forced to hold it back and not be who they are or face public backlash and most didn't want to face it so they just held it in for their lifespan @Brian (Fourth Amendment)

By and large it was treated and it was effective

it is getting so hard to find a natural untarnished pure person these days - what a shame

Soldz, I would agree with that up to the 90's after that, not so much. And we were still successfully treating this long after it was safe to come out of the closet

the biggest issue is thinking any of this belongs anywhere around children. leave them the fuck alone

Pure people exist? <:lul:484994724118134784>

Bieber reported a 27% success ratefrom long-term therapy, but only 18% of the patients in whom Bieber considered the treatment successfulhad been exclusively homosexual to begin with, while 50% had been bisexual. In Haldeman's view, this makes even Bieber's unimpressive claims of success misleading

-wikepedia

and another thing, people shouldn't cut their hair... well remove their hair

that goes for Wombman as well - if it wasn't needed / supposed to be there then it wouldn't grow

Look at studies, not wikipedia, Nick

Just a piece of advice friend.

@Brian (Fourth Amendment) No again the people who did these "treatments" were heavily biased and the people being "treated" still had a certain stigma around it

Wikipedia sources a study

That's what it's there for

An array of sources condensed into an article

I dont trust wikipedia as a source, hold over from the days anyone could edit an article

lol

They used to say a lot of things to make it fit their narrative

Im old hehe

If you don't trust the article look at the things it sources

Like being gay is a disease and shit

^

being gay often spreads disease

Lmao

It's a bunch of nonsense and it worked for that time period because people accepted it

Being gay is NOT a disease but it certainly did help spread HIV and Aids faster

That's why if two guys want to be gay they have to consent to the fact that they'll probably get hiv

I personally dont like the lifestyle the LGBT people live but I still love them

True @NickC64

sexual immorality of any kind destroys society.

But it's also not that simple either @NickC64

If they get HIV they should also accept that they can't have sex again

Either literally or morally

If one of my 4 kids turn out to be Gay I will be sad and afraid for them but I will still love them.

Love is important folks.