Message from @NickC64
Discord ID: 608156265842999297
Not sure how I was grandstanding... but sure.
the very term, “established science” is grandstanding in itself, thats not even commenting on your feigned civility or general tone
again i don’t blame you, since those who taught you also taught you to speak like this
smug liars that they are
LIke it or not, established science is a relevant thing. It's built everything around you. It has an amazing track record. I'm sorry you feel that way.
its a word, a generalized term, that you keep parroting as if it makes your theories fact
its just strong language designed to give your theory an air of authority, its how people like you talk
usually your types are ranting about “muh facts” as if a crime scene can’t be planted with evidence
I don't agree with all *established science*, though. For example, I know gravity has its faults.
gravity doesn't work on quantum and macro levels. It's not a complete theory.
i don’t care, don’t try to extend the olive branch, stop using wizard words
Gravity is a myth, your own leaders have no idea in what it is
Isn't the flat earth society "controlled opposition"
I've looked into flat earth quite a bit and have been debating for a while. And it's not gravity or curvature that convinced me the earth is a globe.
It's the fact that there's *two* celestial poles.
what does that even mean, stop making a preamble to your opinions
you’d get marked down on an essay for that, pointless sentence
There isn't even any south star, only a north star (Polaris). This would only work on a flat earth where the north star is in the middle
haha, I'm leading up to my explanation, Dew. The celestial poles are the points where the sky rotates. Polaris is very close to the north celestial pole, where the sky rotates counter clockwise. The southern cross is very close to the south celestial pole where the sky rotates clockwise.
that whole nonsense?
hardly nonsense.
that's a bi-directional turn the sky makes.
only makes sense on a globe earth.
yes, I've debated Sheeple with that gif
notice how you need a cylinder for it to work?
and if the sky were, in fact, a cylinder, the celestial poles would be forever at their respective horizons.
You don’t? It’s creating the same effect regardless depending on your movement
absolutely not. the sky wouldn't work that way on a flat earth
There’s other explanations besides a spinning globe
I'd love to hear one.
Hi
Can I discuss my views about earth?
Sure, sacrifice
I think earth is hollow like an agg shell, but we're inside of it
@Drewski4343 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfUcldPsLVo This would never work on a globe earth, only 1 direction of the time lapse
everythng we see is inside
Join vc