beyond that we don't agree on the rest of the flat earth model, some don't even want to use a model.

sphere, you fucker

nice evidence for your globe earth

watch your language Fowrad March Productions

whoops you still had 'new member' role @Snack® . fixed it

should work now

We should respect people like Archimedes who devoted so much time and energy into educating people about the truth

Now I can post pictures.

k cool

@RidleyChozo

🖐 high five

That's what I wanted to show you

🖐

we should respect the flat earthers who for thousands of years taught people the truth

Who would win

Smartest scientists that have figured out the shape of the earth through maths and can back their statements up with actual truth

Some bois whos iq is their age

and not respect those who promote the globe lie who push for people being delusional.

globe delusion - look at a flat horizon and see a curve.

@shudzy. Shut up dude, you don't even know that it was Eratosthenes and said Archimedes LOL. Go watch some globe earth indoctrination videos and try to retain the information in your head

There were many globe earther scientists though

Archimedes was my example

Pythagoras or Eratosthenes were the main ones you idiot

Antikythera mechanism this mechanism worked on flat earth, they messed with it and broke it to try to promote the globe.

That still doesn't make the globe earth argument irrelevant

You appealed to authority and didn't provide any evidence, how is that proof?

@^Kevin^ `Antikythera mechanism this mechanism worked on flat earth, they messed with it and broke it to try to promote the globe.` *[citation needed]*

<@349095128247435269>

there was a flat earth video that went into details about it

@RidleyChozo Shit is out of focus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7k7CeWDtWs

Even kids can understand globe earth

I think you mean that even kids can be taught lies.

like kids being taught that santa is real.

```If the object is distant enough, its angular size approaches zero, and the object appears to shrink to a point. Angular resolution is the smallest angular size that is still recognizable by an optical system.

The angular resolution of a human eye is about one arcminute or about 0.017°. If an object has the angular resolution smaller than one arcminute, our eye would not be able to recognize the object.

To increase the object’s angular size, we have to approach the object. Or we can use an optical aid, like a telescope or a binocular. These will improve angular size, and objects with smaller angular size will be easier to discern.

A receding object has a continuously diminishing angular size. If its angular size goes below the limit of our angular resolution, the object will no longer be recognizable. If there’s no barrier, the object would appear whole the entire time until its angular size is too small for us to recognize. In this case, we say the object disappears because of perspective.

In other cases, a receding object appears whole at first, then at some point, a portion of it becomes unseen, and as it goes farther, more of it becomes unseen, all while leaving the rest of the object visible. Such cases are not the result of perspective. The angular size of the object is still higher than our angular resolution. The object gradually becomes unseen because of obstruction from another object, like the curvature of the Earth.

```

this one is out of focus too?

faking a comet

@RidleyChozo Yes.

Clearly.

Instead of spamming videos, do you mind coming up with an argument?

boy oh boy thats kind of a bit out there