Message from @WonTon
Discord ID: 616738924651610112
This is so uncool
@rivenator12113 sigh you can easily find this by googling "world map air traffic"
@WonTon You want opposing party to provide a source for your own claim?
well i can't post pictures sp
so
I used to be able to
So no source, don't come with baseless claims.
also your ultimate goal should be the truth
not to support your bias
so if someone tells you, oh here's a way to find the truth, you should want to pursue it
@WonTon That isn't quantifiable
im actually curious about the way you approach this now
because my goal, is in pursuit of the truth
Yea it's not quantifiable
so if someone tells me, here's a way to get to the truth
i would love to pursue it
Me too, you come with a claim give me the source for that claim.
That source isn't quantifiable
what do you mean by quantifiable?
We can't understand the data clearly.
i see
hang on
The basis of the argument is flawed too, you can have connected flights and still not be cheap. Canada to US to Mexico is not cheaper than Canada to Mexico, even if Canada to US is more popular than to Mexico.
What have I walked into
hell
@rivenator12113 im getting more quantifiable information but im actually curious, why would you not want to look into a source of information or potential information?
personally, I've looked quite extensively into FE models and claims
@WonTon Look at what I just typed, I have that to back me up. Even if it was more in demand, the basis of the argument falls.
i don't just dismiss what other people say and say well you don't have a source well too bad
ill do my own research
no that's besides the point, im just curious because your default was, "you want the opposing side to provide you with a source?"
my question to you is why would you not want to do your own research for the pros and cons of your own argument?
Yes, an opposing party should not be the one fortifying your argument because you're too stupid to make a good one.
Well then where's your proof that flight prices are solely reliant on distance?
woah
Ok just saying this conversation leads to know where and plus you can't win the conversation
no need to resort to ad hominems now
@rivenator12113 I guess the point I'm getting to is your ultimate pursuit the truth? or prove FE?
since the way you answer and react seems very much like the latter rather than the former