There is no better ground than the middle ground i always say

Da

youre not making points, youre making assertions about something entirely different that id be talking about if i were to bring up anarchism

Im not debating tho im informing @The Loftus Nerd about the topic

lol

i find it amazingly ridiculous that you guys focus on my roles carrying on making assertions in response to a video i posted

so wait

your saying that were ridiculous

ignore what the video is reporting on happening in california

I havent even watched the vid tbh

i know

"autism-1 radio is the first words i here"

The chat isnt talking about it so why bring it up

that organization is run by parents of autistic children

lol

Okay

hasn't the claim that vaccines cause autism been disproved multiple times?

no

i would say that many things can cause it

@The Loftus Nerd it has there was only one study and it was disporven almost instantly

yea i dont understand how people can still use it as proof

wasn't it a corrupt study that was proven that the author lied about facts

Because it fits their nerative

https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/

here you have the governments expert witness telling you that they lied, and deceptively used his testimony to convince you that theres no link between vaccines and autism

read it an weep

oracle has spoken

Aight fellow agents pack it up were going home were screwed

I cant upload pics and cant copy the text directly of any of the links but i suggest going to https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/vaccine-myths-debunked/

>propaganda

read the affidavit

Okay so when i post proof that has scientifc links in its propaganda before you look at it

again, people who refuse to examine evidence lack credibility

***if it disagrees with my point P R O P A G A N D A***

Yet when you post a point that is backed up by no real evidence other than things someone said they saw and there is only 1 thing that backs the claim up and that is the claim itselve it's instantly believable

you know, you guys have trolled for long enough

Your "evidence" isnt really evidence for anythiny seeying as its not repeatable or has any sources backing it up

Oh look he pulled his trap card
"If i don't agree with this person hes trolling for having a different opinion"

i thought there were rules against shoving your agenda down peoples throat

The rules encourage researching on your own, as long as you research using specific sources and your findings dont go against ours