hasn't the claim that vaccines cause autism been disproved multiple times?

no

i would say that many things can cause it

@The Loftus Nerd it has there was only one study and it was disporven almost instantly

yea i dont understand how people can still use it as proof

wasn't it a corrupt study that was proven that the author lied about facts

Because it fits their nerative

https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/

here you have the governments expert witness telling you that they lied, and deceptively used his testimony to convince you that theres no link between vaccines and autism

read it an weep

oracle has spoken

Aight fellow agents pack it up were going home were screwed

I cant upload pics and cant copy the text directly of any of the links but i suggest going to https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/vaccine-myths-debunked/

>propaganda

read the affidavit

Okay so when i post proof that has scientifc links in its propaganda before you look at it

again, people who refuse to examine evidence lack credibility

***if it disagrees with my point P R O P A G A N D A***

Yet when you post a point that is backed up by no real evidence other than things someone said they saw and there is only 1 thing that backs the claim up and that is the claim itselve it's instantly believable

you know, you guys have trolled for long enough

Your "evidence" isnt really evidence for anythiny seeying as its not repeatable or has any sources backing it up

Oh look he pulled his trap card
"If i don't agree with this person hes trolling for having a different opinion"

i thought there were rules against shoving your agenda down peoples throat

The rules encourage researching on your own, as long as you research using specific sources and your findings dont go against ours

and youre pretending i didnt give sources right

@The_chickenmaster '' Andrew Wakefield lost his medical license and the paper was retracted from The Lancet. '' he was against vaccinations and he lost his license, many cases!

The guy who made the vacfines cauee autism claim

I wonder why doctors don't talk out against it 🤔

thats a sworn affidavit from the doctor who was the governments expert witness in court regarding this topic, and it was his testimony which was used to mislead you

Because it wae not true what he said and the evidence he had was very biased

He faked an experiment and caused mass panic

Why shouldnt he get fired

Where did he fake the experiment? It only says '' The paper has since been completely discredited due to serious procedural errors, undisclosed financial conflicts of interest, and ethical violations. '' with no backing of it

he was speaking about his 1 patient when he spoke about no link between autism and vaccines

Guy doesn't do his job good and faked an experiment for money and own interest

serious procedural errors he did the procedure wrong

he did no fake experiment

Shouldn't get fired

***serious errors***

Ig someone who pours cianide in a wedding cake of someone homosexual because he hates gay also shouldnt be fired then