Message from @The_chickenmaster

Discord ID: 623013828296179713


2019-09-16 04:31:18 UTC  

Please come to vc. We want to punch you

2019-09-16 04:31:21 UTC  

So. You flunked out of preschool?

2019-09-16 04:31:25 UTC  

^

2019-09-16 04:31:32 UTC  

@Metallica big talk behind a screen

2019-09-16 04:31:44 UTC  

the liquids did NOT return to their stack until One-G. That's awfully dismissive.

2019-09-16 04:31:44 UTC  

I want to talk to you. It’s the opposite

2019-09-16 04:31:47 UTC  

So get in vc

2019-09-16 04:32:12 UTC  

@Drewski4343
p + q = q + p

2019-09-16 04:32:14 UTC  

👏👏👏👏

2019-09-16 04:32:19 UTC  

Well played

2019-09-16 04:32:21 UTC  

If we talking about math sure

2019-09-16 04:32:28 UTC  

Get off crack it’s not doing much for you

2019-09-16 04:32:32 UTC  

It’s you who doesn’t have the evidence you need to beat us. You have no proof

2019-09-16 04:32:48 UTC  

So come to vc where we can have a real conversation

2019-09-16 04:33:07 UTC  

You’re the one that’s scared behind your screen

2019-09-16 04:33:14 UTC  

O.O

2019-09-16 04:33:18 UTC  

You have a point

2019-09-16 04:34:03 UTC  

!mute @Metallica no threats

2019-09-16 04:34:04 UTC  

2019-09-16 04:34:29 UTC  

I. E.

If I eat 5 hamburgers (p) I will be full(q)..
Im full (q) cause I just ate 5 hamburgers(p)..
But in reality, I had Chinese......

2019-09-16 04:34:31 UTC  

I was summoned by a mute

2019-09-16 04:34:36 UTC  

Good morning

2019-09-16 04:34:57 UTC  

That's quite the run around.

2019-09-16 04:35:01 UTC  

Besides, density / buoyancy is disproven immediately by objects still falling in a vacuum chamber.

2019-09-16 04:35:02 UTC  

Well played forming a logical fallacy

2019-09-16 04:35:06 UTC  

Chinese hamburgers

2019-09-16 04:35:45 UTC  

Or is it "Affirming the consequence" 🤔💭

2019-09-16 04:35:46 UTC  

Also

2019-09-16 04:35:49 UTC  

it's one of the easiest claims to disprove.

2019-09-16 04:35:56 UTC  

5 hamburgers till you full

2019-09-16 04:36:07 UTC  

That's a lot

2019-09-16 04:36:31 UTC  

Affirming the consequence, formal logical fallacy

2019-09-16 04:37:28 UTC  

Are you sure all of your beliefs aren’t from minecraft @Mathieus the Walking Witness

2019-09-16 04:37:38 UTC  

*Consequent,* and I don't see how that is the case.

2019-09-16 04:38:27 UTC  

con·de·scend
/ˌkändəˈsend/
Learn to pronounce
verb
verb: condescend; 3rd person present: condescends; past tense: condescended; past participle: condescended; gerund or present participle: condescending

show feelings of superiority; be patronizing.
"take care not to condescend to your reader"
synonyms: patronize, treat condescendingly, speak condescendingly to, speak haughtily to, talk down to, look down one's nose at, look down on, put down, be snobbish to
"take care not to condescend to your reader"
antonyms: respect
do something in a haughty way, as though it is below one's dignity or level of importance.
"we'll be waiting for twenty minutes before she condescends to appear"
synonyms: deign, stoop, descend, lower oneself, humble oneself, demean oneself, debase oneself, vouchsafe, think fit, see fit, deem it worthy of oneself, consent; informalcome down from one's high horse
"a minor official condescended to see us"

2019-09-16 04:38:51 UTC  

Tbf @Drewski4343 a flat earther who actually knows how to debate would respond with "anything is less dense than a vacuum"

2019-09-16 04:39:08 UTC  

But it obviously doesn't prove their point

2019-09-16 04:39:25 UTC  

Because density and buoyancy can't dictate direction

2019-09-16 04:39:27 UTC  

Yes, but then what's pulling the objects down? By their line of thinking, objects would float in a vacuum.