exactly my claim. you need an acclerative force to get buoyancy to work

without one, nothing is buoyant.

Looked like the density tower stayed the same even when he shook the tower up

that is, very, very clearly not what happened.

B r u h

We can't see atoms but we can observe their effects

What scientific method are we talking about here

bruh is not an argument

It is

Actually

What is the scientific method then @Teddy no looking it up.

wrong

It really is

Bruh is a response

bruh is a response, but not an argument

So some kids get in a plane with a density tower, the kid shakes up the tower, mixing the liquids and that suppose to prove gravity is needed for bouyancy?

Could be if you’re arguing about response

What an experiment.....

He is in zero gravity

Soooooooo, if p then q... Q therefore p?

Right?

Please come to vc. We want to punch you

So. You flunked out of preschool?

^

@Metallica big talk behind a screen

the liquids did NOT return to their stack until One-G. That's awfully dismissive.

I want to talk to you. It’s the opposite

So get in vc

@Drewski4343
p + q = q + p

👏👏👏👏

Well played

If we talking about math sure

Get off crack it’s not doing much for you

It’s you who doesn’t have the evidence you need to beat us. You have no proof

So come to vc where we can have a real conversation

You’re the one that’s scared behind your screen

O.O

You have a point

!mute @Metallica no threats

I. E.

If I eat 5 hamburgers (p) I will be full(q)..
Im full (q) cause I just ate 5 hamburgers(p)..
But in reality, I had Chinese......