Message from @sub2technoblade
Discord ID: 629848953416056835
I don't think you should stay silent about something you believe to be true just because you, Attack, are a regulator
i mean sure, both of our opinions can be wrong on a topic, but what topic? which opinions? what you said is pretty vague to me
It's basically: Be quiet or authority gonna get ya :(
The opinion over a government being a corporations, and that adding it to be a mind control bs
i provided the source where theyve defined it that way
ive also provided the sources for those words, its not bs
government is very much a corporation
and it very much does control your mind
Yes, and i don't think these are actually 'proof', my opinion, simple
theres that proof word again, this is fallacious
We think differently and could argue to define a static point, a non-variable, but you're blocking it
guess you haven't looked into it enough
If we're being technical you're right white witch
thats a false accussation, and a projection
Technically, rules are mind controlling
So what
Should we live under anarchy?
do you think you know what anarchy means? it means no rulers
OH RL5
The United States of American and the UNITED STATES corporation are two different things
just as there are two different states for each, or there abouts
New York and NEW YORK are two different things
😬
good for you
What is technoblade?
It's a sponge
Oh?
Nah jk a yt
Ah
anarchy (n.)
1530s, "absence of government," from French anarchie or directly from Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek anarkhia "lack of a leader, the state of people without a government" (in Athens, used of the Year of Thirty Tyrants, 404 B.C., when there was no archon), abstract noun from anarkhos "rulerless," from an- "without" (see an- (1)) + arkhos "leader" (see archon).
Are you an ancap?
Attack pls, you get what i meant
And all goes in smoothly, except you don't get that not everyone evolves mentally nor physically in the same way, but may us look like in some form
We should debate to define a point in which we both agree
But we cant apparentlt
that doesnt justify what i think youd like to advocate
Yeah what YOU think
Tfw question is ignored
i worded it the way i did for good reason
It's not only because you think something is a way, it is
there is what i think you mean, but you havent clearly stated it yet, so im not certain
I cant define spam as the same message and therefore spam different messages