@brother mutton I find it hard to believe the same people that support the flaunting of deviant sexual behaviour...because it’s their right...now says it’s ok to forcibly displace entire communities. You support an Orwellian society. 😡

🤔

boring

Your comments contradict themselves

Why do you think the earth is a globe lol?

We talking about eminent domain?

You said what you said, and l responded to you as l am speaking for anyone in that position, that is NOT head games. I am an anarchist, meaning NO ONE has the right to use force on anyone else except in self defense. @ @brother mutton

Hi wench!

@gooeySlimey you’re always welcome to present some interesting and intellectual conversation. 😁

Hello Metallica. 😃

yWwwwn

Did you switch places with Citizen Z?

lol

@The Gwench you are ignoring my specifics, I made it clear that under a strict moral code and with certain measures in place, relocation would be fine

Why bring sexuality into this?

How does that apply to this situation and Agenda 21? There is no moral code to that. Do your research. 😡

Forced relocation is NEVER MORAL.

@brother mutton

What situation are we talking about?

Agenda 21

What if your in the path of a massive fire and force you to evacuate

@SiliconBassist I’m making a point. It’s selective reasoning. On his part.

They always want to make everything appear green and healthy, like AOC, but deep down it's lies and corruption.

AOC doesn't give two sh**s about the environment, but it gets her votes to pretend.

if you force someone to move away from a fire and they die are you responsible

@Small Wallet

@Small Wallet government shouldn't have started the fire in the first place is the point

You have the right to stand in front of a fire if you so choose.

Well thats assuming the government started the fire

I mean i guess

Also you have the right to have a damn built on you i guess

you cannot take responsibility for someone elses life

damn that's messed up

how can you make them good if they die

@Goy Goddess why the hell not? I've clearly stated how it can be moral, what is actually wrong with the way I have proposed

It's your choice to let the flames consume you.

Choosing a position that suits him best at the time. Not on an overall basis. For example...it’s contradictory indeed when someone chooses ‘no death penalty’ stance, but at the same time...is pro-choice.

^

Not necessarily

People do anything when it suits them.

On principle its wrong but in practice cmon