Message from @Cupcakes

Discord ID: 633482079824510987


2019-10-15 01:47:27 UTC  

real science will prove or disprove ur hypothesis

2019-10-15 01:47:42 UTC  

prove what u made a claim it gets overturned all the time give me one example

2019-10-15 01:47:52 UTC  

just one time

2019-10-15 01:48:25 UTC  

not a claim on my part

2019-10-15 01:48:40 UTC  

u proceeded to give me smoking is good for u was that real science ? also evoluition not real sceince

2019-10-15 01:48:53 UTC  

doctors thought it was

2019-10-15 01:49:00 UTC  

ive seen that page

2019-10-15 01:49:01 UTC  

<:bahahaha:485147430740951041>

2019-10-15 01:49:12 UTC  

yes they thought it was but was their any real science behind it

2019-10-15 01:49:18 UTC  

or was it pseudoscience

2019-10-15 01:49:37 UTC  

is science testable

2019-10-15 01:49:45 UTC  

you havent escaped that youre arguing a falsehood on the basis, of because you say so

2019-10-15 01:50:21 UTC  

im telling u real science rarely gets overturned if ever. i cant think of any examples can u

2019-10-15 01:50:37 UTC  

not becuase i say so can we come up with any examples

2019-10-15 01:50:41 UTC  

?

2019-10-15 01:50:44 UTC  

i can think of an example that hasnt been overturned

2019-10-15 01:50:45 UTC  

I'm back

2019-10-15 01:51:01 UTC  

can u think of one that has been overturned though ?

2019-10-15 01:51:29 UTC  

i think jeremy, that you should learn the scientific method, if you did, then i doubt youd be making the argument that you are

2019-10-15 01:51:37 UTC  

Have you watched Dr. Stone fools 😔

2019-10-15 01:51:46 UTC  

was their science behind the doctors saying smoking is good for u

2019-10-15 01:51:58 UTC  

can u think of anytime real science has been overturned ?

2019-10-15 01:52:08 UTC  

i know the scientific method

2019-10-15 01:52:16 UTC  

doesnt sound like it

2019-10-15 01:52:17 UTC  

the essential parts of it

2019-10-15 01:52:54 UTC  

ok give me the science behind smoking is good for u then lets see ur scientific method please sir

2019-10-15 01:53:49 UTC  

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids to put an end to the psyop conversation (for now), I think a lot of things could be contributed to it based off it's definition but I'm doubtful that every single event that happens which includes the public is a form of psyop and for me the radio broadcast falls into the category of not being a psyop for different reasons

2019-10-15 01:53:58 UTC  

i think that doctors were likely influenced by propaganda. however, i think that how youre arguing science is fallacious

2019-10-15 01:54:08 UTC  

too many debates mason

2019-10-15 01:54:17 UTC  

so we agree their is no sceince behind that ?

2019-10-15 01:54:38 UTC  

You guys fundamentally disagree on what science IS

2019-10-15 01:54:40 UTC  

lol

2019-10-15 01:54:56 UTC  

this is all deflection from what youre actually disputing

2019-10-15 01:55:12 UTC  

i said name a time science was overturned u said the smoking thing

2019-10-15 01:55:21 UTC  

here we are

2019-10-15 01:55:31 UTC  

finding out the smoking thing isnt science

2019-10-15 01:55:37 UTC  

this sorry MISCONCEPTION: Science proves ideas.
CORRECTION: Journalists often write about "scientific proof" and some scientists talk about it, but in fact, the concept of proof — real, absolute proof — is not particularly scientific. Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it. Science accepts or rejects ideas based on the evidence; it does not prove or disprove them. To learn more about this, visit our page describing how science aims to build knowledge.

2019-10-15 01:55:49 UTC  

ok once again can u name me one time science was overturned

2019-10-15 01:55:55 UTC  

not pseudoscience