Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 633481762252652544
youre going to claim it was pseudoscience if i do, so its pointless
do u wanna take this too the debate channel ?
i see no point
youre arguing a falsehood. science doesnt prove or disprove ideas
ur quote is based on the science being pseudoscience
it does pseudoscience doesnt prove or disprove ideas
prove it
real science will prove or disprove ur hypothesis
prove what u made a claim it gets overturned all the time give me one example
just one time
that was a quote from https://undsci.berkeley.edu/teaching/misconceptions.php
not a claim on my part
u proceeded to give me smoking is good for u was that real science ? also evoluition not real sceince
doctors thought it was
ive seen that page
<:bahahaha:485147430740951041>
yes they thought it was but was their any real science behind it
or was it pseudoscience
is science testable
you havent escaped that youre arguing a falsehood on the basis, of because you say so
not becuase i say so can we come up with any examples
?
i can think of an example that hasnt been overturned
I'm back
can u think of one that has been overturned though ?
i think jeremy, that you should learn the scientific method, if you did, then i doubt youd be making the argument that you are
Have you watched Dr. Stone fools 😔
was their science behind the doctors saying smoking is good for u
can u think of anytime real science has been overturned ?
i know the scientific method
doesnt sound like it
the essential parts of it
ok give me the science behind smoking is good for u then lets see ur scientific method please sir
@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids to put an end to the psyop conversation (for now), I think a lot of things could be contributed to it based off it's definition but I'm doubtful that every single event that happens which includes the public is a form of psyop and for me the radio broadcast falls into the category of not being a psyop for different reasons
i think that doctors were likely influenced by propaganda. however, i think that how youre arguing science is fallacious
too many debates mason
so we agree their is no sceince behind that ?
You guys fundamentally disagree on what science IS
lol
this is all deflection from what youre actually disputing