Message from @Cupcakes
Discord ID: 633479875671490570
No it doesn't it increases or decreases Bayesian confidence in a hpyothesis
Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it.
give me a time that happened
when they used real science not pseudo science
that rarely happens
smoking is good for you. overturned later and shown to cause health problems
might have happened a few times
Smoking good
their was real sceince or pseudosceince behind smoking is good for u ?
condemnation without investigation jeremy
=)
real science or pseudoscience behind the phrase smoking is good for u
science has had tons of theories that were thought to be true, and later found to not be true
for example, there have been multiple theories of evolution
give me one time they used real sceince not pseudoscience and it was overturned
evolution is pseudoscience
of course they are gonna say pseudoscience cant prove anything or it changes or gets overturned lol
sorry macro or micro evolution ?
wait, is Human Sheeple gone?
youre using this to try to debunk that science doesnt prove ideas. it doesnt
evolution is too broad a term
give me a time science was overturned real science not pseudoscience
youve give me a lot of pseudoscience no real sceince yet
doesnt matter, youll likely claim anything i provide was pseudoscience. much of it is
thats why they say they cant prove anything cause they are using pseudoscience but claiming its real science
i provided you a quote from science, and you cherry picked it and went on this tangent
MISCONCEPTION: Science proves ideas.
CORRECTION: Journalists often write about "scientific proof" and some scientists talk about it, but in fact, the concept of proof — real, absolute proof — is not particularly scientific. Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it. Science accepts or rejects ideas based on the evidence; it does not prove or disprove them. To learn more about this, visit our page describing how science aims to build knowledge.
so u dont have a single example of when real science was used and was overturned ?
youre going to claim it was pseudoscience if i do, so its pointless
do u wanna take this too the debate channel ?
i see no point
youre arguing a falsehood. science doesnt prove or disprove ideas
ur quote is based on the science being pseudoscience
it does pseudoscience doesnt prove or disprove ideas
prove it
real science will prove or disprove ur hypothesis
prove what u made a claim it gets overturned all the time give me one example
just one time
that was a quote from https://undsci.berkeley.edu/teaching/misconceptions.php
not a claim on my part