MISCONCEPTION: Science proves ideas.
CORRECTION: Journalists often write about "scientific proof" and some scientists talk about it, but in fact, the concept of proof — real, absolute proof — is not particularly scientific. Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it. Science accepts or rejects ideas based on the evidence; it does not prove or disprove them. To learn more about this, visit our page describing how science aims to build knowledge.

amazing glboers been calling flat earther science deniers now we are asking for the science they say science doesnt prove anything lol wtf

No it doesn't it increases or decreases Bayesian confidence in a hpyothesis

Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it.

give me a time that happened

when they used real science not pseudo science

that rarely happens

smoking is good for you. overturned later and shown to cause health problems

might have happened a few times

Smoking good

their was real sceince or pseudosceince behind smoking is good for u ?

condemnation without investigation jeremy

=)

real science or pseudoscience behind the phrase smoking is good for u

science has had tons of theories that were thought to be true, and later found to not be true

for example, there have been multiple theories of evolution

give me one time they used real sceince not pseudoscience and it was overturned

evolution is pseudoscience

of course they are gonna say pseudoscience cant prove anything or it changes or gets overturned lol

sorry macro or micro evolution ?

wait, is Human Sheeple gone?

youre using this to try to debunk that science doesnt prove ideas. it doesnt

:0

evolution is too broad a term

give me a time science was overturned real science not pseudoscience

youve give me a lot of pseudoscience no real sceince yet

doesnt matter, youll likely claim anything i provide was pseudoscience. much of it is

thats why they say they cant prove anything cause they are using pseudoscience but claiming its real science

i provided you a quote from science, and you cherry picked it and went on this tangent

MISCONCEPTION: Science proves ideas.
CORRECTION: Journalists often write about "scientific proof" and some scientists talk about it, but in fact, the concept of proof — real, absolute proof — is not particularly scientific. Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it. Science accepts or rejects ideas based on the evidence; it does not prove or disprove them. To learn more about this, visit our page describing how science aims to build knowledge.

so u dont have a single example of when real science was used and was overturned ?

youre going to claim it was pseudoscience if i do, so its pointless

do u wanna take this too the debate channel ?

i see no point

youre arguing a falsehood. science doesnt prove or disprove ideas

ur quote is based on the science being pseudoscience

it does pseudoscience doesnt prove or disprove ideas

prove it

real science will prove or disprove ur hypothesis

prove what u made a claim it gets overturned all the time give me one example

just one time