full transparency on Congress

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWBUl7oT9sA

Reeeee is the next Q in the making

Shall we all call for full transparency of redacted documents? Really?

💨 💨 💨

Ross: Andy= Andy McCabe?

Strzok: yes

Ross: what case were you talking about opening?

Strzok: can't say; ongoing investigation

@KeithG57 lights fart . . . BANG !

CYA cover yer behind

Original LIST????

Light fart? Let it rumble 😉

Freudian slip there

Ross points out that the texts show weaponized agency

Blue flames

my heavens I have drunken or drank too much coffee

Ross: civil liberties have been violated; due process

Mr. Ross spreads butter evenly.

You did say that........

Due process is usually a cop out

that right there is SPLENDID circumstantial EVIDENCE

Ross: IG report.. there is a bright inviolable line between personal beliefs and investigations -- Strzok words

Ross: so about "F Trump"

shows CLEAR INTENT imho

Strzok points to IG report

What a freaking putz

It is impossible not to cross that line....it is impossible . That is why people get excused from juries.

I gave up watching it, it became to much like a tennis match

Ross: 50,000 messages; some on FBI devices that prove bias

inviolable line

Yep

Official action includes texting.

Ross: "F Trump" "Stop Trump" on FBI devices... that's not over the line?

If no goodness is upheld, if illegal clowns are allowed to continue

`THERE WILL BE LAWLESSness`

lmao ALMOST embarassed ! ! ! !

lol. dude killing him

there WAS bias. There is provable bias. he crossed that inviolable line! There was no way NOT to have bias !!

Ross indicates that bias has affected everything Strzok has touched in all three investigations and beyond