Message from @Charlie
Discord ID: 472410847617089546
and the boss is in TX
so
Parts of the Act remain in place today, but it has been amended many times and was modified substantially by the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965.
When regulations issued under the authority of the Passport Act of 1926 were challenged in Haig v. Agee, Congress enacted ยง 707(b) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1979 (Pub.L. 95โ426, 92 Stat. 993, enacted October 7, 1978), amending ยง 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act making it unlawful to travel abroad without a passport. Until that legislation, under the Travel Control Act of 1918, the president had the authority to require passports for foreign travel only in time of war.
Some provisions that excluded certain classes of immigrants based on their political beliefs were revoked by the Immigration Act of 1990, however members of Communist Parties are still banned from becoming citizens of the United States.
After the September 11, 2001 attacks, President George W. Bush implemented the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System and other border and immigration controls.
In January 2017, President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769 made reference to the "Immigration and Nationality Act".[17]
@Magnify โ Q ๐MAGA-KAG I don't know if this will do any help on what you were asking but this Article is a good read http://www.wbdaily.com/democrats/1989-stealth-muslim-brotherhood-war-against-u-s/
tgif
@retiredDep you there?
@Powder ๐ yep still hanging out
๐ฟ
86 degrees...7:30. a.m.
@Powder ๐ love those cuffs
<:lolol:430293779472318475>
@Powder ๐ yep saw the subject
but seriously... an old friend of mine is the director of development at JibJab in L.A. ... I didn't realize this but they have a new app called GIFgab for mobile devices that make fun animated meme things... like this... if you feel so inclined please download and use-ify to create froggy fun: https://twitter.com/bracco/status/1014955984832217088
Nice color...
@retiredDep alert look ๐
@Powder ๐ I see him
Obama and HRC are going to be dancing today
@Magnify โ Q ๐MAGA-KAG here is another Article this is a good read http://www.wbdaily.com/uncategorized/iran-contras-chickens-coming-home-to-roost/
'look at me' not at the success of Trump
You have gained a rank @eire, you just advanced to 3 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!
Amen @Charlie
@retiredDep @silowetr he is ๐ ing
anyone have the link to the Brill fundraiser still? I'd like to not forget about promoting that on YT
_is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaack_
baby!
hello powder - havent seen u for ages - how do???
welcome back!
Constitutional prohibitions and accommodations Edit
Because of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, no religious tradition can be established as the basis of laws that apply to everyone, including any form of sharia, Christian canon law, Jewish halakha, or rules of dharma from Eastern religions. Laws must be passed in a secular fashion, not by religious authorities. The Free Exercise Clause allows residents to practice any religion or no religion, and there is often controversy about separation of church and state and the balance between these two clauses when the government does or does not accommodate any particular religious practice (for example blue laws that require stores to be closed on Sunday, the Christian holy day).
Direct consultation of any religious law, including any form of sharia, is relatively rare in U.S. jurisprudence, and is generally limited to circumstances where the government is accommodating the religious belief of a specific person. This occurs mainly in matters of arbitration and family law. For example, the law may allow parties to submit a dispute for binding arbitration to a mutually agreed-upon religious authority; mandatory arbitration by a specified or mutually-agreed arbitrator is also a common clause in commercial and labor union contracts. Couples with the same religious beliefs may wish to construct marriage contracts and conduct divorces in concordance with those beliefs, and people may also wish to arrange wills and other financial matters in accordance with their own religious principles. If presented as evidence, devotion to peaceful religious principles, along with many other aspects of personality, is commonly considered when judging the character of a person before the law, for example during sentencing or a parole hearing.
@สษชษดแดสส แดษขแดษดแด๐๐ฆ wb me too!
Despite the Free Exercise Clause, the 1878 Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v. United States (which concerned the conflict of the Mormon practice of polygamy with anti-bigamy laws) affirmed that secular laws still apply when they contradict religious practices, unless a superseding law establishes a right to a religious accommodation. This means that belief in sharia cannot be used by itself as a justification for vigilante stonings or to prevent women from filing for divorce.
***BIG HUGS***
(it burns)
sorry... that's my rope
In June 2009, a family court judge in Hudson County, New Jersey denied a restraining order to a woman who testified that her husband, a Muslim, had forced her to have non-consensual sex. The judge said he did not believe the man "had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault" his wife because he was acting in a way that was "consistent with his practices." A state appeals court reversed his decision.[4] Advocates of the ban in the U.S. have cited this case as an example of the need for the ban.[5]
As of 2014 more than two dozen U.S. states have considered measures intended to restrict judges from consulting sharia law. Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, Tennessee, North Carolina, Alabama and Texas[6][7] have "banned sharia", i.e., passed foreign law bans.[1] In 2010 and 2011 more than two dozen states "considered measures to restrict judges from consulting Shariah, or foreign and religious laws more generally".[8] As of 2013, all but 16 states have considered such a law.[1]
In November 2010, voters in Oklahoma approved a ballot measure to amend the state constitution to ban sharia from state courts.[9][10] The law was then updated to include all foreign or religious laws.[11] The law was challenged by an official of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. In November 2010 a federal judge ruled the law to be unconstitutional and blocked the state from putting it into effect.[12][not in citation given][13] The court found the ban had the potential to do harm to Muslims. The invalidation of a will and testament using sharia instructions was an example.[14] That ruling and injunction were upheld by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 10, 2012.[15]
@Deleted User who are you hugging?
we were just talking about pink handcuffs... great way to wake up!
Missouri also passed a measure banning foreign law in 2013, but Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed the bill "because of its potential impact on international adoptions."[1]
Two other states banning sharia were North Carolina, which prohibited state judges from considering Islamic law in family cases in 2013,[16] and Alabama, where voters passed an Amendment to the State Constitution (72% to 28%) to "ban sharia" in 2014.[17]
